Views
Graph
Explorer
Focus
Down
Load 1 level
Load 2 levels
Load 3 levels
Load 4 levels
Load all levels
All
Dagre
Focus
Down
Load 1 level
Load 2 levels
Load 3 levels
Load 4 level
Load all levels
All
Tree
SpaceTree
Focus
Expanding
Load 1 level
Load 2 levels
Load 3 levels
Down
All
Down
Radial
Focus
Expanding
Load 1 level
Load 2 levels
Load 3 levels
Down
All
Down
Box
Focus
Expanding
Down
Up
All
Down
Page ✓
Article
Outline
Document
Down
All
Canvas
Time
Timeline
Calendar
Request email digest
Past 24 hours
Past 2 days
Past 3 days
Past week
Add
Add page
Add comment
Add citation
Edit
Edit page
Delete page
Share
Link
Bookmark
Embed
Social media
Login
Member login
Register now for a free account
🔎
United States
Protagonist
1
#438092
CONTEXT
(Help)
-
Electronic Waste »
Electronic Waste
Electronic Waste☜An issue map of electronic waste as a matter of concern.☜F1CEB7
▲
Draft Technical Guidelines »
Draft Technical Guidelines
Draft Technical Guidelines☜An issue map of the negotiations over the design of Technical Guidelines on transboundary movement of e-waste, in particular regarding the distinction between waste and non-waste.☜9FDDBE
▲
Actors »
Actors
Actors☜Actors who commented on any draft of the Technical Guidelines on Transboundary Movements of Electronic and Electrical Waste and Used Electrical and Electronic Equipment, in Particular Regarding the Distinction between Waste and Non-Waste under the Basel Convention.☜D3B8AB
■
United States
United States☜☜D3B8AB
►
Precision needed in distinction between waste/non-waste »
Precision needed in distinction between waste/non-waste
Precision needed in distinction between waste/non-waste☜☜FFFACD
►
Technical Guidelines should link to MPPI and PACE »
Technical Guidelines should link to MPPI and PACE
Technical Guidelines should link to MPPI and PACE☜A position that the Technical Guidelines should link to or be harmonized with parallel initiatives underway in the Basel process, namely the Mobile Phone Partnership Initiative (MPPI) and the Partnership for Action on Computing Equipment (PACE).☜FFFACD
►
Recognize the benefits of recovery »
Recognize the benefits of recovery
Recognize the benefits of recovery☜A position that holds that recovery is a desirable way to manage electronic discards.☜FFFACD
►
Control procedures must match the Convention »
Control procedures must match the Convention
Control procedures must match the Convention☜A position that the Technical Guidelines must accurately reflect the legal provisions for control of transboundary movement of hazardous waste under the Basel Convention. The Guidelines should not establish separate requirements relating to the control of tansboundary movements of electronic discards.☜FFFACD
►
Shipments under warranty/lease/product servicing are not waste »
Shipments under warranty/lease/product servicing are not waste
Shipments under warranty/lease/product servicing are not waste☜A position that holds that transboundary shipments of used equipment should not be considered waste if the shipment constitutes warranty/lease/product servicing returns from a producer to the original producer, original component supplier, or a contract agent completing warranty/lease/product servicing activity on behalf of an original producer.☜FFFACD
►
Consider using price paid to disntinguish waste/non-waste »
Consider using price paid to disntinguish waste/non-waste
Consider using price paid to disntinguish waste/non-waste☜If prices paid for used equipment are below what would be expected for working equipment, this may be a good indicator of a waste shipment.☜FFFACD
►
Basel Convention cannot regulate non-wastes. »
Basel Convention cannot regulate non-wastes.
Basel Convention cannot regulate non-wastes.☜☜FFFACD
►
Guidelines should help facilitate trade of non-waste »
Guidelines should help facilitate trade of non-waste
Guidelines should help facilitate trade of non-waste☜☜FFFACD
►
Add proposed list of hazardous/non-hazardous equipment »
Add proposed list of hazardous/non-hazardous equipment
Add proposed list of hazardous/non-hazardous equipment☜BAN suggests adding Annex II bis Examples of Hazards (as defined by the Basel Convention) in Electronic Equipment to the Draft Technical Guidelines of 21 February 2011. The list would include whole equipment, components, and substances.☜FFFACD
►
Proposed list of hazards contains inaccuracies »
Proposed list of hazards contains inaccuracies
Proposed list of hazards contains inaccuracies☜An argument that holds that the list of example hazardous materials in electronic equipment proposed by BAN to be included in the Guidelines (as Annex II bis) contains inaccuracies that not all Basel Parties have agreed to.☜FFFACD
►
All listed wastes may be classified as non-hazardous »
All listed wastes may be classified as non-hazardous
All listed wastes may be classified as non-hazardous☜Annex III of the Basel Convention can support the classification of a given substance as non-hazardous if it can be demonstrated to not exhibit characteristics listed in Annex III.☜FFFACD
►
Inappropriate to apply waste regulations to repair and refurbishment »
Inappropriate to apply waste regulations to repair and refurbishment
Inappropriate to apply waste regulations to repair and refurbishment☜☜FFFACD
►
Delete proposed list of hazardous/non-hazardous equipment »
Delete proposed list of hazardous/non-hazardous equipment
Delete proposed list of hazardous/non-hazardous equipment☜☜FFFACD
►
Scope should not refer to equipment that "may be waste" »
Scope should not refer to equipment that "may be waste"
Scope should not refer to equipment that "may be waste"☜☜FFFACD
►
Guidelines should not exceed scope of Basel Convention »
Guidelines should not exceed scope of Basel Convention
Guidelines should not exceed scope of Basel Convention☜A position that holds that any references in the Technical Guidelines that suggest the Basel Convention has any legal bearing on non-wastes is a mistake.☜FFFACD
►
There is no consensus on correlations between listed wastes »
There is no consensus on correlations between listed wastes
There is no consensus on correlations between listed wastes☜☜FFFACD
►
Guidelines should not include a reference to Ban Amendment. »
Guidelines should not include a reference to Ban Amendment.
Guidelines should not include a reference to Ban Amendment.☜☜FFFACD
►
Meanings of maintenance, refurbishment, and repair need clarification »
Meanings of maintenance, refurbishment, and repair need clarification
Meanings of maintenance, refurbishment, and repair need clarification☜☜FFFACD
►
Use key function approach »
Use key function approach
Use key function approach☜☜FFFACD
►
Defective and return is to producer »
Defective and return is to producer
Defective and return is to producer☜☜FFFACD
►
Definition of professional use too ambiguous »
Definition of professional use too ambiguous
Definition of professional use too ambiguous☜☜FFFACD
►
Listing facilities is not feasible »
Listing facilities is not feasible
Listing facilities is not feasible☜☜FFFACD
►
A risk of Eurocentrism in guideline criteria »
A risk of Eurocentrism in guideline criteria
A risk of Eurocentrism in guideline criteria☜The inclusion of Restriction of Hazardous Substances (RoHS) legislation into the criteria for distinguishing between waste and non-waste is deemed to be Eurocentric.☜FFFACD
►
Annex VII not in force »
Annex VII not in force
Annex VII not in force☜☜FFFACD
►
Should not exclude components »
Should not exclude components
Should not exclude components☜☜FFFACD
►
Alt 26b must be amended »
Alt 26b must be amended
Alt 26b must be amended☜☜FFFACD
►
50-80% export figure is of questionable reliability »
50-80% export figure is of questionable reliability
50-80% export figure is of questionable reliability☜☜FFFACD
Heading
Summary
Click the button to enter task scheduling information
Open
Details
Enter task details
Message text
Select assignee(s)
Due date (click calendar)
RadDatePicker
RadDatePicker
Open the calendar popup.
Calendar
Title and navigation
Title and navigation
<<
<
April 2024
>
<<
April 2024
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
14
31
1
2
3
4
5
6
15
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
16
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
17
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
18
28
29
30
1
2
3
4
19
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Reminder
No reminder
1 day before due
2 days before due
3 days before due
1 week before due
Ready to post
Copy to text
Enter
Cancel
Task assignment(s) have been emailed and cannot now be altered
Lock
Cancel
Save
Comment graphing options
Choose comments:
Comment only
Whole thread
All comments
Choose location:
To a new map
To this map
New map options
Select map ontology
Options
Standard (default) ontology
College debate ontology
Hypothesis ontology
Influence diagram ontology
Story ontology
Graph to private map
Cancel
Proceed
+Comments (
0
)
- Comments
Add a comment
Newest first
Oldest first
Show threads
+Citations (
0
)
- Citations
Add new citation
List by:
Citerank
Map
+About
- About
Entered by:-
Josh Lepawsky
NodeID:
#438092
Node type:
Protagonist
Entry date (GMT):
7/28/2016 9:11:00 AM
Last edit date (GMT):
7/28/2016 9:11:00 AM
Show other editors
Incoming cross-relations:
0
Outgoing cross-relations:
27
Average rating:
0
by
0
users
x
Select file to upload