Definition of professional use too ambiguous

“We are uncomfortable with the ambiguous term “professional use.” While it is not explicitly defined in the EU WEEE Directive, it appears to be limited to medical devices. This may result in it having negative (and unintended) consequences on other sectors.”


From p. 11 of response by United States to Basel Secretariat. 2012. ‘Draft Technical Guidelines on Transboundary Movement of E-Waste, in Particular Regarding the Distinction between Waste and Non-Waste (Version of 27 September 2012)’. http://www.basel.int/Portals/4/download.aspx?d=UNEP-CHW-OEWG.8-INF-9-Rev.1.English.doc.

 

CONTEXT(Help)
-
Electronic Waste »Electronic Waste
Draft Technical Guidelines »Draft Technical Guidelines
Issues »Issues
Situations in which used equipment is or is not waste »Situations in which used equipment is or is not waste
Criteria for equipment not to be considered waste »Criteria for equipment not to be considered waste
Used professional equipment returned to producer »Used professional equipment returned to producer
Definition of professional use too ambiguous
2012-09 Draft Technical Guidelines [2012 Sep] »2012-09 Draft Technical Guidelines [2012 Sep]
United States »United States
+Comments (0)
+Citations (0)
+About