Views
Graph
Explorer
Focus
Down
Load 1 level
Load 2 levels
Load 3 levels
Load 4 levels
Load all levels
All
Dagre
Focus
Down
Load 1 level
Load 2 levels
Load 3 levels
Load 4 level
Load all levels
All
Tree
SpaceTree
Focus
Expanding
Load 1 level
Load 2 levels
Load 3 levels
Down
All
Down
Radial
Focus
Expanding
Load 1 level
Load 2 levels
Load 3 levels
Down
All
Down
Box
Focus
Expanding
Down
Up
All
Down
Page ✓
Article
Outline
Document
Down
All
Canvas
Time
Timeline
Calendar
Request email digest
Past 24 hours
Past 2 days
Past 3 days
Past week
Add
Add page
Add comment
Add citation
Edit
Edit page
Delete page
Share
Link
Bookmark
Embed
Social media
Login
Member login
Register now for a free account
🔎
2011-02 Draft Technical Guidelines [2011 Feb]
Document
1
#437778
CONTEXT
(Help)
-
Electronic Waste »
Electronic Waste
Electronic Waste☜An issue map of electronic waste as a matter of concern.☜F1CEB7
▲
Draft Technical Guidelines »
Draft Technical Guidelines
Draft Technical Guidelines☜An issue map of the negotiations over the design of Technical Guidelines on transboundary movement of e-waste, in particular regarding the distinction between waste and non-waste.☜9FDDBE
▲
Documents »
Documents
Documents☜☜B5ACA0
■
2011-02 Draft Technical Guidelines [2011 Feb]
2011-02 Draft Technical Guidelines [2011 Feb]☜☜B5ACA0
◄
Definition of waste and hazardous waste »
Definition of waste and hazardous waste
Definition of waste and hazardous waste☜Direct references to Section C of the Draft Technical Guidelines titled Definitions of waste and hazardous waste.☜FFFACD
◄
Definition of whole equipment and intact equipment needed »
Definition of whole equipment and intact equipment needed
Definition of whole equipment and intact equipment needed☜☜FFFACD
◄
Guidelines need ability to establish evolving list of e-wastes »
Guidelines need ability to establish evolving list of e-wastes
Guidelines need ability to establish evolving list of e-wastes☜As electronics become incorporated into a growing number of items, the Guidelines need the ability to specify an evolving list of such items that will be considered e-waste.☜FFFACD
◄
Basel Convention cannot regulate non-wastes. »
Basel Convention cannot regulate non-wastes.
Basel Convention cannot regulate non-wastes.☜☜FFFACD
◄
Need to distinguish between consumer and capital goods »
Need to distinguish between consumer and capital goods
Need to distinguish between consumer and capital goods☜A position that holds that it is a mistake to treat all electronic goods or products as of the same class.☜FFFACD
◄
Capital goods can have long service lives »
Capital goods can have long service lives
Capital goods can have long service lives☜The COCIR, MITA, JIRA, and AMCHAM EU consortium argues that captial goods can have service lives in excess of 10 years.☜FFFACD
◄
Capital goods typically require specialized repair »
Capital goods typically require specialized repair
Capital goods typically require specialized repair☜The industry consortium of COCIR, MITA, JIRA, and AMCHAM EU argue that in the case of capital goods for professional use, equipment often requires repair at the manufacturer.☜FFFACD
◄
Recovery of rare earth metals is poor justification for recycling »
Recovery of rare earth metals is poor justification for recycling
Recovery of rare earth metals is poor justification for recycling☜A position that holds that recycling electronics for rare earth metals recovery is rarely efficient and therefore should not be used as a justification recycling as a form of environmentally sound management.☜FFFACD
◄
Scope of Technical Guidelines needs clarification »
Scope of Technical Guidelines needs clarification
Scope of Technical Guidelines needs clarification☜☜FFFACD
◄
Scope should cover all e-waste »
Scope should cover all e-waste
Scope should cover all e-waste☜The Guidelines should cover shredded, broken, and crushed electronic waste as well as component parts and whole equipment.☜FFFACD
◄
Technical Guidelines should harmonize with PACE and MPPI »
Technical Guidelines should harmonize with PACE and MPPI
Technical Guidelines should harmonize with PACE and MPPI☜☜FFFACD
◄
PACE and MPPI overly represent industry interests. »
PACE and MPPI overly represent industry interests.
PACE and MPPI overly represent industry interests.☜☜FFFACD
◄
Reuse needs clarification. »
Reuse needs clarification.
Reuse needs clarification.☜A position that Annex IX B1110 of the Basel Convention causes confusion where it states that re-use can include repair, refurbishment or upgrading, but not major reassembly yet does not define what counts as major re-assembly.☜FFFACD
◄
Intent should not be criteria for distinguishing waste/non-waste »
Intent should not be criteria for distinguishing waste/non-waste
Intent should not be criteria for distinguishing waste/non-waste☜A position that holds that it is a mistake to attempt to impute the intent of the last owner of a discarded electronic item.☜FFFACD
◄
Situations in which used equipment is or is not waste »
Situations in which used equipment is or is not waste
Situations in which used equipment is or is not waste☜☜FFFACD
◄
There is a need for functionality tests prior to shipment »
There is a need for functionality tests prior to shipment
There is a need for functionality tests prior to shipment☜Functionality tests should be performed on used equipment to determine its suitability for reuse.☜FFFACD
◄
Clarification needed on meaning of 'fully functional' »
Clarification needed on meaning of 'fully functional'
Clarification needed on meaning of 'fully functional'☜☜FFFACD
◄
Meeting functionality test prior to shipment not always possible »
Meeting functionality test prior to shipment not always possible
Meeting functionality test prior to shipment not always possible☜There are situations, such as returns to manufacturers, in which functionality testing cannot be done prior to shipment. Those tests may only be able to be performed within specialized facilities at the manufacturer or subcontractor locations.☜FFFACD
◄
Exempt medical devices »
Exempt medical devices
Exempt medical devices☜A position that holds that Technical Guidelines need to exempt medical devices from trade restrictions. The need arises because various forms of test, repair, and root cause analysis may be cost prohibitive in country of export and, also, may be a regulatory requirement.☜FFFACD
◄
Exemptions for some situations are needed »
Exemptions for some situations are needed
Exemptions for some situations are needed☜☜FFFACD
◄
No provision for exemptions in Basel Convention »
No provision for exemptions in Basel Convention
No provision for exemptions in Basel Convention☜An argument that opposes the position that shipments for warranty or related purposes are not waste and therefore are outside the scope of the Basel Convention.☜FFFACD
◄
Exempt shipments under warranty/lease/product servicing »
Exempt shipments under warranty/lease/product servicing
Exempt shipments under warranty/lease/product servicing☜A position that holds that transboundary shipments of used equipment should not be considered waste if the shipment constitutes warranty/lease/product servicing returns from a producer to the original producer, original component supplier, or a contract agent completing warranty/lease/product servicing activity on behalf of an original producer.☜FFFACD
◄
50-80% export figure is of questionable reliability »
50-80% export figure is of questionable reliability
50-80% export figure is of questionable reliability☜☜FFFACD
◄
50-80% export figure needs to be taken in context »
50-80% export figure needs to be taken in context
50-80% export figure needs to be taken in context☜BAN suggests an alteration to the text of the Draft Technical Guidelines where a study is cited as source for the figure of 50-80 percent exports.☜FFFACD
◄
E-waste generation and flow figures need clarification »
E-waste generation and flow figures need clarification
E-waste generation and flow figures need clarification☜What figures to use to characterize the amount of e-waste generated and how those figures are arrived at becomes an issue amongst protagonists.☜FFFACD
◄
Add proposed list of hazardous/non-hazardous equipment »
Add proposed list of hazardous/non-hazardous equipment
Add proposed list of hazardous/non-hazardous equipment☜BAN suggests adding Annex II bis Examples of Hazards (as defined by the Basel Convention) in Electronic Equipment to the Draft Technical Guidelines of 21 February 2011. The list would include whole equipment, components, and substances.☜FFFACD
Heading
Summary
Click the button to enter task scheduling information
Open
Details
Enter task details
Message text
Select assignee(s)
Due date (click calendar)
RadDatePicker
RadDatePicker
Open the calendar popup.
Calendar
Title and navigation
Title and navigation
<<
<
December 2024
>
<<
December 2024
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
48
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
49
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
50
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
51
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
52
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
53
29
30
31
1
2
3
4
Reminder
No reminder
1 day before due
2 days before due
3 days before due
1 week before due
Ready to post
Copy to text
Enter
Cancel
Task assignment(s) have been emailed and cannot now be altered
Lock
Cancel
Save
Comment graphing options
Choose comments:
Comment only
Whole thread
All comments
Choose location:
To a new map
To this map
New map options
Select map ontology
Options
Standard (default) ontology
College debate ontology
Hypothesis ontology
Influence diagram ontology
Story ontology
Graph to private map
Cancel
Proceed
+Comments (
0
)
- Comments
Add a comment
Newest first
Oldest first
Show threads
+Citations (
0
)
- Citations
Add new citation
List by:
Citerank
Map
+About
- About
Entered by:-
Josh Lepawsky
NodeID:
#437778
Node type:
Document
Entry date (GMT):
7/21/2016 11:21:00 AM
Last edit date (GMT):
7/21/2016 11:29:00 AM
Show other editors
Incoming cross-relations:
26
Outgoing cross-relations:
0
Average rating:
0
by
0
users
x
Select file to upload