Views
Graph
Explorer
Focus
Down
Load 1 level
Load 2 levels
Load 3 levels
Load 4 levels
Load all levels
All
Dagre
Focus
Down
Load 1 level
Load 2 levels
Load 3 levels
Load 4 level
Load all levels
All
Tree
SpaceTree
Focus
Expanding
Load 1 level
Load 2 levels
Load 3 levels
Down
All
Down
Radial
Focus
Expanding
Load 1 level
Load 2 levels
Load 3 levels
Down
All
Down
Box
Focus
Expanding
Down
Up
All
Down
Page ✓
Article
Outline
Document
Down
All
Canvas
Time
Timeline
Calendar
Request email digest
Past 24 hours
Past 2 days
Past 3 days
Past week
Add
Add page
Add comment
Add citation
Edit
Edit page
Delete page
Share
Link
Bookmark
Embed
Social media
Login
Member login
Register now for a free account
🔎
Scope of Technical Guidelines needs clarification
Issue
1
#437942
CONTEXT
(Help)
-
Electronic Waste »
Electronic Waste
Electronic Waste☜An issue map of electronic waste as a matter of concern.☜F1CEB7
▲
Draft Technical Guidelines »
Draft Technical Guidelines
Draft Technical Guidelines☜An issue map of the negotiations over the design of Technical Guidelines on transboundary movement of e-waste, in particular regarding the distinction between waste and non-waste.☜9FDDBE
▲
Issues »
Issues
Issues☜☜FFB597
■
Scope of Technical Guidelines needs clarification
Scope of Technical Guidelines needs clarification☜☜FFB597
●
Basel Convention cannot regulate non-wastes. »
Basel Convention cannot regulate non-wastes.
Basel Convention cannot regulate non-wastes.☜☜59C6EF
●
Control procedures must match the Convention »
Control procedures must match the Convention
Control procedures must match the Convention☜A position that the Technical Guidelines must accurately reflect the legal provisions for control of transboundary movement of hazardous waste under the Basel Convention. The Guidelines should not establish separate requirements relating to the control of tansboundary movements of electronic discards.☜59C6EF
●
Definition of whole equipment and intact equipment needed »
Definition of whole equipment and intact equipment needed
Definition of whole equipment and intact equipment needed☜☜59C6EF
●
Guidelines need ability to establish evolving list of e-wastes »
Guidelines need ability to establish evolving list of e-wastes
Guidelines need ability to establish evolving list of e-wastes☜As electronics become incorporated into a growing number of items, the Guidelines need the ability to specify an evolving list of such items that will be considered e-waste.☜59C6EF
●
Guidelines should clarify applicability of Basel Convention »
Guidelines should clarify applicability of Basel Convention
Guidelines should clarify applicability of Basel Convention☜A position that holds that there is a need for the Technical Guidelines to clarify the applicability of the Basel Convention to the transboundary movement of end-of-life electronics and electronic products destined for materials recovery.☜59C6EF
●
Guidelines should cover whole equipment, not materials. »
Guidelines should cover whole equipment, not materials.
Guidelines should cover whole equipment, not materials.☜☜59C6EF
●
Guidelines should help facilitate trade of non-waste »
Guidelines should help facilitate trade of non-waste
Guidelines should help facilitate trade of non-waste☜☜59C6EF
●
Guidelines should not exceed scope of Basel Convention »
Guidelines should not exceed scope of Basel Convention
Guidelines should not exceed scope of Basel Convention☜A position that holds that any references in the Technical Guidelines that suggest the Basel Convention has any legal bearing on non-wastes is a mistake.☜59C6EF
●
Guidelines should support BAN Amendment. »
Guidelines should support BAN Amendment.
Guidelines should support BAN Amendment.☜BAN notes that the Amendment adopted in 1995 though not yet in force has been implemented, by many countries.☜59C6EF
●
Need to distinguish between consumer and capital goods »
Need to distinguish between consumer and capital goods
Need to distinguish between consumer and capital goods☜A position that holds that it is a mistake to treat all electronic goods or products as of the same class.☜59C6EF
●
Precision needed in distinction between waste/non-waste »
Precision needed in distinction between waste/non-waste
Precision needed in distinction between waste/non-waste☜☜59C6EF
●
Recognize benefits of repair and reuse »
Recognize benefits of repair and reuse
Recognize benefits of repair and reuse☜A position that prolonging the use of electronics as well as their repair and reuse have economic, social and environmental benefits that should be made explicit in the Technical Guidelines.☜59C6EF
●
Recognize the benefits of recovery »
Recognize the benefits of recovery
Recognize the benefits of recovery☜A position that holds that recovery is a desirable way to manage electronic discards.☜59C6EF
●
Recovery of rare earth metals is poor justification for recycling »
Recovery of rare earth metals is poor justification for recycling
Recovery of rare earth metals is poor justification for recycling☜A position that holds that recycling electronics for rare earth metals recovery is rarely efficient and therefore should not be used as a justification recycling as a form of environmentally sound management.☜59C6EF
●
Scope of Guidelines should cover parts and components »
Scope of Guidelines should cover parts and components
Scope of Guidelines should cover parts and components☜☜59C6EF
●
Scope should cover all e-waste »
Scope should cover all e-waste
Scope should cover all e-waste☜The Guidelines should cover shredded, broken, and crushed electronic waste as well as component parts and whole equipment.☜59C6EF
●
Scope should not refer to equipment that "may be waste" »
Scope should not refer to equipment that "may be waste"
Scope should not refer to equipment that "may be waste"☜☜59C6EF
●
Technical Guidelines should harmonize with PACE and MPPI »
Technical Guidelines should harmonize with PACE and MPPI
Technical Guidelines should harmonize with PACE and MPPI☜☜59C6EF
●
Technical Guidelines should link to MPPI and PACE »
Technical Guidelines should link to MPPI and PACE
Technical Guidelines should link to MPPI and PACE☜A position that the Technical Guidelines should link to or be harmonized with parallel initiatives underway in the Basel process, namely the Mobile Phone Partnership Initiative (MPPI) and the Partnership for Action on Computing Equipment (PACE).☜59C6EF
●
Transboundary movement of e-waste should be primary issue »
Transboundary movement of e-waste should be primary issue
Transboundary movement of e-waste should be primary issue☜The distinction between waste and non-waste is important but subordinate to a broader issue: the transboundary movement of e-waste.☜59C6EF
●
Whole-part distinctions difficult to make »
Whole-part distinctions difficult to make
Whole-part distinctions difficult to make☜Whole-part relationships between equipment and its components are difficult to make and the relationship can change. For example, a computer is comprised of components that are sometimes marketed as standalone components (e.g., keyboard, monitor, RAM).☜59C6EF
►
2010-09 Draft Technical Guidelines [2010 Sept] »
2010-09 Draft Technical Guidelines [2010 Sept]
2010-09 Draft Technical Guidelines [2010 Sept]☜☜FFFACD
►
2011-02 Draft Technical Guidelines [2011 Feb] »
2011-02 Draft Technical Guidelines [2011 Feb]
2011-02 Draft Technical Guidelines [2011 Feb]☜☜FFFACD
Heading
Summary
Click the button to enter task scheduling information
Open
Details
Enter task details
Message text
Select assignee(s)
Due date (click calendar)
RadDatePicker
RadDatePicker
Open the calendar popup.
Calendar
Title and navigation
Title and navigation
<<
<
November 2024
>
<<
November 2024
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
44
27
28
29
30
31
1
2
45
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
46
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
47
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
48
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
49
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Reminder
No reminder
1 day before due
2 days before due
3 days before due
1 week before due
Ready to post
Copy to text
Enter
Cancel
Task assignment(s) have been emailed and cannot now be altered
Lock
Cancel
Save
Comment graphing options
Choose comments:
Comment only
Whole thread
All comments
Choose location:
To a new map
To this map
New map options
Select map ontology
Options
Standard (default) ontology
College debate ontology
Hypothesis ontology
Influence diagram ontology
Story ontology
Graph to private map
Cancel
Proceed
+Comments (
0
)
- Comments
Add a comment
Newest first
Oldest first
Show threads
+Citations (
0
)
- Citations
Add new citation
List by:
Citerank
Map
+About
- About
Entered by:-
Josh Lepawsky
NodeID:
#437942
Node type:
Issue
Entry date (GMT):
7/26/2016 9:11:00 AM
Last edit date (GMT):
7/26/2016 9:17:00 AM
Show other editors
Incoming cross-relations:
0
Outgoing cross-relations:
2
Average rating:
2
by
1
users
x
Select file to upload