Affordances need to be redefined
As affordances aren't representations, they provide no help in understanding the encoding processes in the brain involved in perception and cognition. Symbolic models have been helpful. So it's best to redefine affordances in terms of symbols.
Alonso Vera & Herbert Simon (1993c).
CONTEXT(Help)
-
Artificial Intelligence »Artificial Intelligence
Can computers think? [1] »Can computers think? [1]
Yes: physical symbol systems can think [3] »Yes: physical symbol systems can think [3]
The Representationalist Assumption »The Representationalist Assumption
The representational tradition is flawed »The representational tradition is flawed
The Situated Action Paradigm »The Situated Action Paradigm
Affordances are features of the environment »Affordances are features of the environment
Affordances are just symbolic representations »Affordances are just symbolic representations
Affordances can't be redefined as symbols »Affordances can't be redefined as symbols
Affordances need to be redefined
Herbert Simon »Herbert Simon
+Comments (0)
+Citations (0)
+About