Views
Graph
Explorer
Focus
Down
Load 1 level
Load 2 levels
Load 3 levels
Load 4 levels
Load all levels
All
Dagre
Focus
Down
Load 1 level
Load 2 levels
Load 3 levels
Load 4 level
Load all levels
All
Tree
SpaceTree
Focus
Expanding
Load 1 level
Load 2 levels
Load 3 levels
Down
All
Down
Radial
Focus
Expanding
Load 1 level
Load 2 levels
Load 3 levels
Down
All
Down
Box
Focus
Expanding
Down
Up
All
Down
Page ✓
Article
Outline
Document
Down
All
Canvas
Time
Timeline
Calendar
Request email digest
Past 24 hours
Past 2 days
Past 3 days
Past week
Add
Add page
Add comment
Add citation
Edit
Edit page
Delete page
Share
Link
Bookmark
Embed
Social media
Login
Member login
Register now for a free account
🔎
Canada
Protagonist
1
#437941
CONTEXT
(Help)
-
Electronic Waste »
Electronic Waste
Electronic Waste☜An issue map of electronic waste as a matter of concern.☜F1CEB7
▲
Draft Technical Guidelines »
Draft Technical Guidelines
Draft Technical Guidelines☜An issue map of the negotiations over the design of Technical Guidelines on transboundary movement of e-waste, in particular regarding the distinction between waste and non-waste.☜9FDDBE
▲
Actors »
Actors
Actors☜Actors who commented on any draft of the Technical Guidelines on Transboundary Movements of Electronic and Electrical Waste and Used Electrical and Electronic Equipment, in Particular Regarding the Distinction between Waste and Non-Waste under the Basel Convention.☜D3B8AB
■
Canada
Canada☜☜D3B8AB
►
Term "e-waste" confuses waste/non-waste distinction »
Term "e-waste" confuses waste/non-waste distinction
Term "e-waste" confuses waste/non-waste distinction☜Because the term e-waste already contains the term waste, its use in the Technical Guidelines confuses what the document is supposed to accomplish, that is, the distinction between waste and non-waste. It would be better to use the phrase used and end of life electronic and electrical equipment.☜FFFACD
►
Whole-part distinctions difficult to make »
Whole-part distinctions difficult to make
Whole-part distinctions difficult to make☜Whole-part relationships between equipment and its components are difficult to make and the relationship can change. For example, a computer is comprised of components that are sometimes marketed as standalone components (e.g., keyboard, monitor, RAM).☜FFFACD
►
Precision needed in distinction between waste/non-waste »
Precision needed in distinction between waste/non-waste
Precision needed in distinction between waste/non-waste☜☜FFFACD
►
Technical Guidelines should link to MPPI and PACE »
Technical Guidelines should link to MPPI and PACE
Technical Guidelines should link to MPPI and PACE☜A position that the Technical Guidelines should link to or be harmonized with parallel initiatives underway in the Basel process, namely the Mobile Phone Partnership Initiative (MPPI) and the Partnership for Action on Computing Equipment (PACE).☜FFFACD
►
Global e-waste generation figures needed »
Global e-waste generation figures needed
Global e-waste generation figures needed☜The Draft Technical Guidelines of 22 September 2010 quote numbers for generation of e-waste in the European Union.☜FFFACD
►
Clarification needed on meaning of 'fully functional' »
Clarification needed on meaning of 'fully functional'
Clarification needed on meaning of 'fully functional'☜☜FFFACD
►
Clarification needed on the meaning of "essential part" »
Clarification needed on the meaning of "essential part"
Clarification needed on the meaning of "essential part"☜☜FFFACD
►
Tests need to capture broad range of equipment »
Tests need to capture broad range of equipment
Tests need to capture broad range of equipment☜☜FFFACD
►
"E-waste" is broad category with highly variable national definitions »
"E-waste" is broad category with highly variable national definitions
"E-waste" is broad category with highly variable national definitions☜☜FFFACD
►
Countries should develop own lists of hazardous equipment »
Countries should develop own lists of hazardous equipment
Countries should develop own lists of hazardous equipment☜A position that holds that individual countries should develop their own lists of equipment, components and substances that are deemed to be hazardous with respect to national legislation.☜FFFACD
►
Delete proposed list of hazardous/non-hazardous equipment »
Delete proposed list of hazardous/non-hazardous equipment
Delete proposed list of hazardous/non-hazardous equipment☜☜FFFACD
►
Add proposed list of hazardous/non-hazardous equipment »
Add proposed list of hazardous/non-hazardous equipment
Add proposed list of hazardous/non-hazardous equipment☜BAN suggests adding Annex II bis Examples of Hazards (as defined by the Basel Convention) in Electronic Equipment to the Draft Technical Guidelines of 21 February 2011. The list would include whole equipment, components, and substances.☜FFFACD
►
Use existing Basel Convention provisions to decide waste/non-waste »
Use existing Basel Convention provisions to decide waste/non-waste
Use existing Basel Convention provisions to decide waste/non-waste☜A position that holds that the Basel Convention itself is already designed to distinguish wastes over which it has jurisdiction and non-wastes over which it holds no jurisdiction. In particular, Articles 3, 4, and 13 of the Convention.☜FFFACD
►
Use Basel Convention Article 4.1 to decide waste/non-waste »
Use Basel Convention Article 4.1 to decide waste/non-waste
Use Basel Convention Article 4.1 to decide waste/non-waste☜☜FFFACD
►
50-80% export figure is of questionable reliability »
50-80% export figure is of questionable reliability
50-80% export figure is of questionable reliability☜☜FFFACD
►
Life-span is bad criterion »
Life-span is bad criterion
Life-span is bad criterion☜☜FFFACD
►
Definitive guidance difficult to provide »
Definitive guidance difficult to provide
Definitive guidance difficult to provide☜☜FFFACD
►
Consensus definition of obsolete is needed »
Consensus definition of obsolete is needed
Consensus definition of obsolete is needed☜☜FFFACD
Heading
Summary
Click the button to enter task scheduling information
Open
Details
Enter task details
Message text
Select assignee(s)
Due date (click calendar)
RadDatePicker
RadDatePicker
Open the calendar popup.
Calendar
Title and navigation
Title and navigation
<<
<
April 2024
>
<<
April 2024
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
14
31
1
2
3
4
5
6
15
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
16
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
17
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
18
28
29
30
1
2
3
4
19
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Reminder
No reminder
1 day before due
2 days before due
3 days before due
1 week before due
Ready to post
Copy to text
Enter
Cancel
Task assignment(s) have been emailed and cannot now be altered
Lock
Cancel
Save
Comment graphing options
Choose comments:
Comment only
Whole thread
All comments
Choose location:
To a new map
To this map
New map options
Select map ontology
Options
Standard (default) ontology
College debate ontology
Hypothesis ontology
Influence diagram ontology
Story ontology
Graph to private map
Cancel
Proceed
+Comments (
0
)
- Comments
Add a comment
Newest first
Oldest first
Show threads
+Citations (
0
)
- Citations
Add new citation
List by:
Citerank
Map
+About
- About
Entered by:-
Josh Lepawsky
NodeID:
#437941
Node type:
Protagonist
Entry date (GMT):
7/26/2016 9:07:00 AM
Last edit date (GMT):
7/26/2016 9:07:00 AM
Show other editors
Incoming cross-relations:
0
Outgoing cross-relations:
18
Average rating:
0
by
0
users
x
Select file to upload