Paragraph 26: when used equipment should not be considered waste
Paragraph 26 of the Draft Technical Guidelines attempts to address the conditions under which used equipment should not be considered waste. This paragraph became contentious during OWEG deliberations between 5 October 2014 and 5 November 2014.
CONTEXT(Help)
-
Electronic Waste »Electronic Waste
▲
Draft Technical Guidelines »Draft Technical Guidelines
▲
Issues »Issues
▲
Situations in which used equipment is or is not waste »Situations in which used equipment is or is not waste
■
Paragraph 26: when used equipment should not be considered waste
●
26b should apply to whole equipment »26b should apply to whole equipment
●
26b should include remanufacturing »26b should include remanufacturing
●
Ban Amendment must not be undermined  »Ban Amendment must not be undermined
●
Exemptions for non-waste are dangerous »Exemptions for non-waste are dangerous
●
Need for precise scope of defnitions of waste & non-waste »Need for precise scope of defnitions of waste & non-waste
●
Risk of exceeding scope of Basel Convention »Risk of exceeding scope of Basel Convention
●
26b "Preferred option" »26b "Preferred option"
●
Alt 26b »Alt 26b
►
2014-11 Draft Technical Guidelines [2014 Nov 20]  »2014-11 Draft Technical Guidelines [2014 Nov 20]
◄
Criteria for equipment not to be considered waste »Criteria for equipment not to be considered waste
+Comments (0)
+Citations (0)
+About