Impenetrability doesn't argue against image theory
The cognitive impenetrability condition doesn't refute image theory because the image theory doesn't assume that all image processes are cognitively impenetrable.
The image theory acknowledges that some image processes are cognitively penetrable, whereas others are not.

The theory also recognises that determining which are which is an important research issue.

Stephen Kosslyn, Stephen Pinker, George E. Smith, and Steven P. Schwartz (1979).
CONTEXT(Help)
-
Artificial Intelligence »Artificial Intelligence
▲
Can computers think? [1] »Can computers think? [1]
▲
No: computers can't understand images [5b] »No: computers can't understand images [5b]
▲
Images represented by filled cells in an array »Images represented by filled cells in an array
▲
Images are Quasi-pictorial representations »Images are Quasi-pictorial representations
▲
Image Psychology »Image Psychology
▲
Images are primitive, functional components of thought »Images are primitive, functional components of thought
▲
Images aren't primitive explanatory concepts »Images aren't primitive explanatory concepts
▲
Images are cognitively penetrable »Images are cognitively penetrable
■
Impenetrability doesn't argue against image theory
+Comments (0)
+Citations (0)
+About