"E-waste" is broad category with highly variable national definitions

“It is anticipated that such an approach would be problematic given that “e-waste” captures a very broad range of electrical and electronic equipment (EEE) and many countries currently define and characterize e-waste differently under their national laws.  As a result, it is anticipated that consensus on such a list would be very difficult to achieve within the global community.”

From p. 1 of response from Canada to Basel Secretariat. 2012. ‘Draft Technical Guidelines on Transboundary Movement of E-Waste, in Particular Regarding the Distinction between Waste and Non-Waste (Version 8 May 2012)’. http://www.basel.int/Implementation/Ewaste/TechnicalGuidelines/DevelopmentofTGs/tabid/2377/Default.aspx.

 


CONTEXT(Help)
-
Electronic Waste »Electronic Waste
Draft Technical Guidelines »Draft Technical Guidelines
Issues »Issues
Definition of waste and hazardous waste »Definition of waste and hazardous waste
Add proposed list of hazardous/non-hazardous equipment »Add proposed list of hazardous/non-hazardous equipment
"E-waste" is broad category with highly variable national definitions
2012-05 Draft Technical Guidelines [2012 May] »2012-05 Draft Technical Guidelines [2012 May]
Canada »Canada
+Comments (0)
+Citations (0)
+About