Views
Graph
Explorer
Focus
Down
Load 1 level
Load 2 levels
Load 3 levels
Load 4 levels
Load all levels
All
Dagre
Focus
Down
Load 1 level
Load 2 levels
Load 3 levels
Load 4 level
Load all levels
All
Tree
SpaceTree
Focus
Expanding
Load 1 level
Load 2 levels
Load 3 levels
Down
All
Down
Radial
Focus
Expanding
Load 1 level
Load 2 levels
Load 3 levels
Down
All
Down
Box
Focus
Expanding
Down
Up
All
Down
Page ✓
Article
Outline
Document
Down
All
Canvas
Time
Timeline
Calendar
Request email digest
Past 24 hours
Past 2 days
Past 3 days
Past week
Add
Add page
Add comment
Add citation
Edit
Edit page
Delete page
Share
Link
Bookmark
Embed
Social media
Login
Member login
Register now for a free account
🔎
SUPER PARRY could pass Test by brute force
SupportiveArgument
1
#3901
An advanced alien civilisation could write a program, like, Colby's PARRY, containing ready made responses to questions. This SUPER PARRY would be better prepared for the test, however, because it would contain responses to all possible questions.
SUPER PARRY could therefore pass the Turing test by brute force. But it is clearly not thinking; it is just dumbly searching a long list of conversations.
Jack Copeland, 1993.
CONTEXT
(Help)
-
Artificial Intelligence »
Artificial Intelligence
Artificial Intelligence☜A collaboratively editable version of Robert Horns brilliant and pioneering debate map Can Computers Think?—exploring 50 years of philosophical argument about the possibility of computer thought.☜F1CEB7
▲
Can the Turing Test determine this? [2] »
Can the Turing Test determine this? [2]
Can the Turing Test determine this? [2] ☜Is the Turing Test—proposed by Alan Turing in 1950—an adequate test of thinking? Can it determine whether a machine can think? If a computer passess the test by persuading judges via a teletyped conversation that its human can it be said to think?☜FFB597
▲
Yes: defines intelligence operationally/behaviorally »
Yes: defines intelligence operationally/behaviorally
Yes: defines intelligence operationally/behaviorally☜The Turing test defines thinking in terms of overt, measurable behavior. It offers a behavioral/operational definition of our ordinary concept of thinking.☜59C6EF
▲
The black box objection »
The black box objection
The black box objection☜The Test treats the mind as a black box—internal processes are left hidden and mysterious; all that matters is input and output. But internal processing shouldnt be ignored, as its crucial to determining whether or not a system really thinks.☜EF597B
■
SUPER PARRY could pass Test by brute force
SUPER PARRY could pass Test by brute force☜An advanced alien civilisation could write a program, like, Colbys PARRY, containing ready made responses to questions. This SUPER PARRY would be better prepared for the test, however, because it would contain responses to all possible questions.☜98CE71
●
Repeated sentence maneuver »
Repeated sentence maneuver
Repeated sentence maneuver☜An interrogator could trick SUPER PARRY by typing the same sentence over and over again.☜EF597B
●
Substitution trick »
Substitution trick
Substitution trick☜An interrogator could trick SUPER PARRY by typing Lets write *!= in place of horse; now tell me whether a *! = has a tail.☜EF597B
►
All Possible Conversations Machine »
All Possible Conversations Machine
All Possible Conversations Machine☜An unintelligent machine engaging in sensible conversation by searching a database containing all possible lines of conversation in a finite Turing test, would pass the neo-Turing test—but it would be only echoing its programmers intelligence.☜FFFACD
►
PARRY »
PARRY
PARRY☜PARRY beat an extended Turing test by simulating a paranoid subject via a natural language parser and an interpretation-action module tracking a range of emotional states and applying paranoia-specific strategies to deal with shame-induced distress.☜FFFACD
◄
Jack Copeland »
Jack Copeland
Jack Copeland☜Arguments advanced by Jack Copeland.☜FFFACD
Heading
Summary
Click the button to enter task scheduling information
Open
Details
Enter task details
Message text
Select assignee(s)
Due date (click calendar)
RadDatePicker
RadDatePicker
Open the calendar popup.
Calendar
Title and navigation
Title and navigation
<<
<
November 2024
>
<<
November 2024
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
44
27
28
29
30
31
1
2
45
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
46
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
47
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
48
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
49
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Reminder
No reminder
1 day before due
2 days before due
3 days before due
1 week before due
Ready to post
Copy to text
Enter
Cancel
Task assignment(s) have been emailed and cannot now be altered
Lock
Cancel
Save
Comment graphing options
Choose comments:
Comment only
Whole thread
All comments
Choose location:
To a new map
To this map
New map options
Select map ontology
Options
Standard (default) ontology
College debate ontology
Hypothesis ontology
Influence diagram ontology
Story ontology
Graph to private map
Cancel
Proceed
+Comments (
0
)
- Comments
Add a comment
Newest first
Oldest first
Show threads
+Citations (
0
)
- Citations
Add new citation
List by:
Citerank
Map
+About
- About
Entered by:-
David Price
NodeID:
#3901
Node type:
SupportiveArgument
Entry date (GMT):
12/6/2007 12:51:00 PM
Last edit date (GMT):
12/6/2007 12:51:00 PM
Show other editors
Incoming cross-relations:
1
Outgoing cross-relations:
2
Average rating:
0
by
0
users
x
Select file to upload