|
Add to map
|
Post message
|
Move element
|
Cross-relate
|
Cite
|
New map
|
|
|
Natalie Anne Prystajecky Person1 #679854 Natalie Prystajecky is the program head for the Environmental Microbiology program at the BCCDC Public Health Laboratory. She is also a clinical associate professor in the Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine at UBC. | Research - Dr. Prystajecky’s research interests are public health, environmental microbiology, drinking water, food quality, genomics and molecular diagnostics. Her work is at the intersection of environmental exposures (food and water) and clinical outcomes. She uses emerging technologies to improve routine surveillance and outbreak investigations for foodborne and waterborne pathogens.
- Her current research interests include development of new water-quality tests using metagenomics, targeted resequencing of wetland sediments to study the emergence of avian influenza strains and whole-genome sequencing of giardia and salmonella. She is keen to promote the translation of research methods to routine testing in diagnostic and reference laboratories.
Bio - Dr. Prystajecky received her PhD in 2010 and a certificate in watershed management in 2008, both from UBC. She holds a BSc in Cellular, Molecular and Microbiology (CMMB) and a BSc in Environmental Science – Biology Focus, both from the University of Calgary, in 2003. She holds a Canadian College of Microbiologist Specialist Microbiology designation in Environmental Microbiology SCCM (ENV). She is the program head for the Environmental Microbiology program at the BCCDC Public Health Laboratory.
- Her awards include an Institute of Infection and Immunity (CIHR-III) Doctoral Research Award from the Canadian Foundation for Infectious Disease (CFID)/Canadian Institute for Health Research (2006-2009), a Senior Trainee Top-Up Award from the Michael Smith Foundation for Health Research (MSFHR) (2006-2008) and a UBC PhD Tuition Award from UBC (2005-2009)
| Edit details | | Page view | Show >>Citations18Comments0HistoryInfo<< Hide |
CitationsAdd new citationList by: CiterankMap Link[2] Clinical Severity of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Omicron Variant Relative to Delta in British Columbia, Canada: A Retrospective Analysis of Whole-Genome Sequenced Cases
Author: Sean P Harrigan, James Wilton, Mei Chong, Younathan Abdia, Hector Velasquez Garcia, Caren Rose, Marsha Taylor, Sharmistha Mishra, Beate Sander, Linda Hoang, John Tyson, Mel Krajden, Natalie Prystajecky, Naveed Z Janjua, Hind Sbihi Publication date: 30 August 2022 Publication info: Clinical Infectious Diseases, Volume 76, Issue 3, 1 February 2023, Pages e18–e25 Cited by: David Price 11:05 PM 25 November 2023 GMT Citerank: (6) 679757Beate SanderCanada Research Chair in Economics of Infectious Diseases and Director, Health Modeling & Health Economics and Population Health Economics Research at THETA (Toronto Health Economics and Technology Assessment Collaborative).10019D3ABAB, 679856Naveed Zafar JanjuaDr. Naveed Zafar Janjua is an epidemiologist and senior scientist at the BC Centre for Disease Control and Clinical Associate Professor at School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia. Dr. Janjua is a Medical Doctor (MBBS) with a Masters of Science (MSc) degree in Epidemiology & Biostatistics and Doctorate in Public Health (DrPH). 10019D3ABAB, 679880Sharmistha MishraSharmistha Mishra is an infectious disease physician and mathematical modeler and holds a Tier 2 Canadian Research Chair in Mathematical Modeling and Program Science.10019D3ABAB, 701020CANMOD – PublicationsPublications by CANMOD Members144B5ACA0, 704045Covid-19859FDEF6, 708734Genomics859FDEF6 URL: DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciac705
| Excerpt / Summary [Clinical Infectious Diseases, 1 February 2023]
Background: In late 2021, the Omicron severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 variant emerged and rapidly replaced Delta as the dominant variant. The increased transmissibility of Omicron led to surges in case rates and hospitalizations; however, the true severity of the variant remained unclear. We aimed to provide robust estimates of Omicron severity relative to Delta.
Methods: This retrospective cohort study was conducted with data from the British Columbia COVID-19 Cohort, a large provincial surveillance platform with linkage to administrative datasets. To capture the time of cocirculation with Omicron and Delta, December 2021 was chosen as the study period. Whole-genome sequencing was used to determine Omicron and Delta variants. To assess the severity (hospitalization, intensive care unit [ICU] admission, length of stay), we conducted adjusted Cox proportional hazard models, weighted by inverse probability of treatment weights (IPTW).
Results: The cohort was composed of 13 128 individuals (7729 Omicron and 5399 Delta). There were 419 coronavirus disease 2019 hospitalizations, with 118 (22%) among people diagnosed with Omicron (crude rate = 1.5% Omicron, 5.6% Delta). In multivariable IPTW analysis, Omicron was associated with a 50% lower risk of hospitalization compared with Delta (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] = 0.50, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.43 to 0.59), a 73% lower risk of ICU admission (aHR = 0.27, 95% CI = 0.19 to 0.38), and a 5-day shorter hospital stay (aß = −5.03, 95% CI = −8.01 to −2.05).
Conclusions: Our analysis supports findings from other studies that have demonstrated lower risk of severe outcomes in Omicron-infected individuals relative to Delta. |
Link[3] Hands off the Mink! Using Environmental Sampling for SARS-CoV-2 Surveillance in American Mink
Author: Ellen Boyd, Michelle Coombe, Natalie Prystajecky, Jessica M. Caleta, Inna Sekirov, John Tyson, Chelsea Himsworth Publication date: 10 January 2023 Publication info: Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20(2), 1248; Cited by: David Price 11:09 PM 25 November 2023 GMT Citerank: (2) 701020CANMOD – PublicationsPublications by CANMOD Members144B5ACA0, 704045Covid-19859FDEF6 URL: DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20021248
| Excerpt / Summary [Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 10 January 2023]
Throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, numerous non-human species were shown to be susceptible to natural infection by SARS-CoV-2, including farmed American mink. Once infected, American mink can transfer the virus from mink to human and mink to mink, resulting in a high rate of viral mutation. Therefore, outbreak surveillance on American mink farms is imperative for both mink and human health. Historically, disease surveillance on mink farms has consisted of a combination of mortality and live animal sampling; however, these methodologies have significant limitations. This study compared PCR testing of both deceased and live animal samples to environmental samples on an active outbreak premise, to determine the utility of environmental sampling. Environmental sampling mirrored trends in both deceased and live animal sampling in terms of percent positivity and appeared more sensitive in some low-prevalence instances. PCR CT values of environmental samples were significantly different from live animal samples’ CT values and were consistently high (mean CT = 36.2), likely indicating a low amount of viral RNA in the samples. There is compelling evidence in favour of environmental sampling for the purpose of disease surveillance, specifically as an early warning tool for SARS-CoV-2; however, further work is needed to ultimately determine whether environmental samples are viable sources for molecular epidemiology investigations. |
Link[4] Two-Dose Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Vaccine Effectiveness With Mixed Schedules and Extended Dosing Intervals: Test-Negative Design Studies From British Columbia and Quebec, Canada
Author: Danuta M Skowronski, Yossi Febriani, Manale Ouakki, et al. - Solmaz Setayeshgar, Shiraz El Adam, Macy Zou, Denis Talbot, Natalie Prystajecky, John R Tyson, Rodica Gilca, Nicholas Brousseau, Geneviève Deceuninck, Eleni Galanis, Chris D Fjell, Hind Sbihi, Elise Fortin, Sapha Barkati, Chantal Sauvageau, Monika Naus, David M Patrick, Bonnie Henry, Linda M N Hoang, Philippe De Wals, Christophe Garenc, Alex Carignan, Mélanie Drolet, Agatha N Jassem, Manish Sadarangani, Marc Brisson, Mel Krajden, Gaston De Serres Publication date: 19 April 2022 Publication info: Clinical Infectious Diseases, Volume 75, Issue 11, 1 December 2022, Pages 1980–1992 Cited by: David Price 8:56 PM 26 November 2023 GMT Citerank: (5) 679839Marc BrissonDr. Marc Brisson is full professor at Laval University where he leads the Research Group in Mathematical Modeling and Health Economics of Infectious Diseases.10019D3ABAB, 701020CANMOD – PublicationsPublications by CANMOD Members144B5ACA0, 704041Vaccination859FDEF6, 704041Vaccination859FDEF6, 704045Covid-19859FDEF6 URL: DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciac290
| Excerpt / Summary [Clinical Infectious Diseases, December 2022]
Background: The Canadian coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) immunization strategy deferred second doses and allowed mixed schedules. We compared 2-dose vaccine effectiveness (VE) by vaccine type (mRNA and/or ChAdOx1), interval between doses, and time since second dose in 2 of Canada’s larger provinces.
Methods: Two-dose VE against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection or hospitalization among adults ≥18 years, including due to Alpha, Gamma, and Delta variants of concern (VOCs), was assessed ≥14 days postvaccination by test-negative design studies separately conducted in British Columbia and Quebec, Canada, between 30 May and 27 November (epi-weeks 22–47) 2021.
Results: In both provinces, all homologous or heterologous mRNA and/or ChAdOx1 2-dose schedules were associated with ≥90% reduction in SARS-CoV-2 hospitalization risk for ≥7 months. With slight decline from a peak of >90%, VE against infection was ≥80% for ≥6 months following homologous mRNA vaccination, lower by ∼10% when both doses were ChAdOx1 but comparably high following heterologous ChAdOx1 + mRNA receipt. Findings were similar by age group, sex, and VOC. VE was significantly higher with longer 7–8-week versus manufacturer-specified 3–4-week intervals between mRNA doses.
Conclusions: Two doses of any mRNA and/or ChAdOx1 combination gave substantial and sustained protection against SARS-CoV-2 hospitalization, spanning Delta-dominant circulation. ChAdOx1 VE against infection was improved by heterologous mRNA series completion. A 7–8-week interval between first and second doses improved mRNA VE and may be the optimal schedule outside periods of intense epidemic surge. Findings support interchangeability and extended intervals between SARS-CoV-2 vaccine doses, with potential global implications for low-coverage areas and, going forward, for children. |
Link[5] Targeted genomic sequencing with probe capture for discovery and surveillance of coronaviruses in bats
Author: Kevin S Kuchinski, Kara D Loos, Andrew DS Cameron, et al. - Danae M Suchan, Jennifer N Russell, Ashton N Sies, Charles Kumakamba, Francisca Muyembe, Placide Mbala Kingebeni, Ipos Ngay Lukusa, Frida N’Kawa, Joseph Atibu Losoma, Maria Makuwa, Amethyst Gillis, Matthew LeBreton, James A Ayukekbong, Nicole A Lerminiaux, Corina Monagin, Damien O Joly, Karen Saylors, Nathan D Wolfe, Edward M Rubin, Jean J Muyembe Tamfum, Natalie A Prystajecky, David J McIver, Christian E Lange Publication date: 8 November 2022 Publication info: eLife 11:e79777 Cited by: David Price 9:15 PM 26 November 2023 GMT Citerank: (3) 701020CANMOD – PublicationsPublications by CANMOD Members144B5ACA0, 704045Covid-19859FDEF6, 708734Genomics859FDEF6 URL: DOI: https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.79777
| Excerpt / Summary [eLife, 8 November 2022]
Public health emergencies like SARS, MERS, and COVID-19 have prioritized surveillance of zoonotic coronaviruses, resulting in extensive genomic characterization of coronavirus diversity in bats. Sequencing viral genomes directly from animal specimens remains a laboratory challenge, however, and most bat coronaviruses have been characterized solely by PCR amplification of small regions from the best-conserved gene. This has resulted in limited phylogenetic resolution and left viral genetic factors relevant to threat assessment undescribed. In this study, we evaluated whether a technique called hybridization probe capture can achieve more extensive genome recovery from surveillance specimens. Using a custom panel of 20,000 probes, we captured and sequenced coronavirus genomic material in 21 swab specimens collected from bats in the Democratic Republic of the Congo. For 15 of these specimens, probe capture recovered more genome sequence than had been previously generated with standard amplicon sequencing protocols, providing a median 6.1-fold improvement (ranging up to 69.1-fold). Probe capture data also identified five novel alpha- and betacoronaviruses in these specimens, and their full genomes were recovered with additional deep sequencing. Based on these experiences, we discuss how probe capture could be effectively operationalized alongside other sequencing technologies for high-throughput, genomics-based discovery and surveillance of bat coronaviruses. |
Link[6] Characterizing Longitudinal Antibody Responses in Recovered Individuals Following COVID-19 Infection and Single-Dose Vaccination: A Prospective Cohort Study
Author: Andrea D. Olmstead, Aidan M. Nikiforuk, Sydney Schwartz, Ana Citlali Márquez, Tahereh Valadbeigy, Eri Flores, Monika Saran, David M. Goldfarb, Althea Hayden, Shazia Masud, Shannon L. Russell, Natalie Prystajecky, Agatha N. Jassem, Muhammad Morshed, Inna Sekirov Publication date: 31 October 2022 Publication info: Viruses 2022, 14(11), 2416; Cited by: David Price 9:18 PM 26 November 2023 GMT Citerank: (3) 701020CANMOD – PublicationsPublications by CANMOD Members144B5ACA0, 704041Vaccination859FDEF6, 704045Covid-19859FDEF6 URL: DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/v14112416
| Excerpt / Summary [Viruses, 31 October 2022]
Background: Investigating antibody titers in individuals who have been both naturally infected with SARS-CoV-2 and vaccinated can provide insight into antibody dynamics and correlates of protection over time.
Methods: Human coronavirus (HCoV) IgG antibodies were measured longitudinally in a prospective cohort of qPCR-confirmed, COVID-19 recovered individuals (k = 57) in British Columbia pre- and post-vaccination. SARS-CoV-2 and endemic HCoV antibodies were measured in serum collected between Nov. 2020 and Sept. 2021 (n = 341). Primary analysis used a linear mixed-effects model to understand the effect of single dose vaccination on antibody concentrations adjusting for biological sex, age, time from infection and vaccination. Secondary analysis investigated the cumulative incidence of high SARS-CoV-2 anti-spike IgG seroreactivity equal to or greater than 5.5 log10 AU/mL up to 105 days post-vaccination. No re-infections were detected in vaccinated participants, post-vaccination by qPCR performed on self-collected nasopharyngeal specimens.
Results: Bivariate analysis (complete data for 42 participants, 270 samples over 472 days) found SARS-CoV-2 spike and RBD antibodies increased 14–56 days post-vaccination (p < 0.001) and vaccination prevented waning (regression coefficient, B = 1.66 [95%CI: 1.45–3.46]); while decline of nucleocapsid antibodies over time was observed (regression coefficient, B = −0.24 [95%CI: −1.2-(−0.12)]). A positive association was found between COVID-19 vaccination and endemic human β-coronavirus IgG titer 14–56 days post vaccination (OC43, p = 0.02 & HKU1, p = 0.02). On average, SARS-CoV-2 anti-spike IgG concentration increased in participants who received one vaccine dose by 2.06 log10 AU/mL (95%CI: 1.45–3.46) adjusting for age, biological sex, and time since infection. Cumulative incidence of high SARS-CoV-2 spike antibodies (>5.5 log10 AU/mL) was 83% greater in vaccinated compared to unvaccinated individuals.
Conclusions: Our study confirms that vaccination post-SARS-CoV-2 infection provides multiple benefits, such as increasing anti-spike IgG titers and preventing decay up to 85 days post-vaccination. |
Link[7] Cov2clusters: genomic clustering of SARS-CoV-2 sequences
Author: Benjamin Sobkowiak, Kimia Kamelian, James E. A. Zlosnik, John Tyson, Anders Gonçalves da Silva, Linda M. N. Hoang, Natalie Prystajecky, Caroline Colijn Publication date: 19 October 2022 Publication info: BMC Genomics volume 23, Article number: 710 (2022) Cited by: David Price 10:43 PM 27 November 2023 GMT Citerank: (4) 679761Caroline ColijnDr. Caroline Colijn works at the interface of mathematics, evolution, infection and public health, and leads the MAGPIE research group. She joined SFU's Mathematics Department in 2018 as a Canada 150 Research Chair in Mathematics for Infection, Evolution and Public Health. She has broad interests in applications of mathematics to questions in evolution and public health, and was a founding member of Imperial College London's Centre for the Mathematics of Precision Healthcare.10019D3ABAB, 701020CANMOD – PublicationsPublications by CANMOD Members144B5ACA0, 704045Covid-19859FDEF6, 708734Genomics859FDEF6 URL: DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-022-08936-4
| Excerpt / Summary [BMC Genomics, 19 October 2022]
Background: The COVID-19 pandemic remains a global public health concern. Advances in sequencing technologies has allowed for high numbers of SARS-CoV-2 whole genome sequence (WGS) data and rapid sharing of sequences through global repositories to enable almost real-time genomic analysis of the pathogen. WGS data has been used previously to group genetically similar viral pathogens to reveal evidence of transmission, including methods that identify distinct clusters on a phylogenetic tree. Identifying clusters of linked cases can aid in the regional surveillance and management of the disease. In this study, we present a novel method for producing stable genomic clusters of SARS-CoV-2 cases, cov2clusters, and compare the accuracy and stability of our approach to previous methods used for phylogenetic clustering using real-world SARS-CoV-2 sequence data obtained from British Columbia, Canada.
Results: We found that cov2clusters produced more stable clusters than previously used phylogenetic clustering methods when adding sequence data through time, mimicking an increase in sequence data through the pandemic. Our method also showed high accuracy when predicting epidemiologically informed clusters from sequence data.
Conclusions: Our new approach allows for the identification of stable clusters of SARS-CoV-2 from WGS data. Producing high-resolution SARS-CoV-2 clusters from sequence data alone can a challenge and, where possible, both genomic and epidemiological data should be used in combination. |
Link[8] Older Adults Mount Less Durable Humoral Responses to Two Doses of COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine but Strong Initial Responses to a Third Dose
Author: Francis Mwimanzi, Hope R Lapointe, Peter K Cheung, et al. Publication date: 11 May 2022 Publication info: The Journal of Infectious Diseases, Volume 226, Issue 6, 15 September 2022, Pages 983–994, Cited by: David Price 11:02 PM 27 November 2023 GMT Citerank: (3) 701020CANMOD – PublicationsPublications by CANMOD Members144B5ACA0, 704041Vaccination859FDEF6, 704045Covid-19859FDEF6 URL: DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jiac199
| Excerpt / Summary [The Journal of Infectious Diseases, 15 September 2022]
Background: Third coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine doses are broadly recommended, but immunogenicity data remain limited, particularly in older adults.
Methods: We measured circulating antibodies against the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) spike protein receptor-binding domain, ACE2 displacement, and virus neutralization against ancestral and omicron (BA.1) strains from prevaccine up to 1 month following the third dose, in 151 adults aged 24–98 years who received COVID-19 mRNA vaccines.
Results: Following 2 vaccine doses, humoral immunity was weaker, less functional, and less durable in older adults, where a higher number of chronic health conditions was a key correlate of weaker responses and poorer durability. One month after the third dose, antibody concentrations and function exceeded post–second-dose levels, and responses in older adults were comparable in magnitude to those in younger adults at this time. Humoral responses against omicron were universally weaker than against the ancestral strain after both the second and third doses. Nevertheless, after 3 doses, anti-omicron responses in older adults reached equivalence to those in younger adults. One month after 3 vaccine doses, the number of chronic health conditions, but not age, was the strongest consistent correlate of weaker humoral responses.
Conclusions: Results underscore the immune benefits of third COVID-19 vaccine doses, particularly in older adults. |
Link[9] Serial infection with SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.1 and BA.2 following three-dose COVID-19 vaccination
Author: Hope R. Lapointe, Francis Mwimanzi, Peter K. Cheung, et al. Publication date: 6 September 2022 Publication info: Frontiers in Immunology, 6 September 2022, Volume 13 - 2022 Cited by: David Price 11:33 PM 27 November 2023 GMT Citerank: (3) 701020CANMOD – PublicationsPublications by CANMOD Members144B5ACA0, 704041Vaccination859FDEF6, 704045Covid-19859FDEF6 URL: DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2022.947021
| Excerpt / Summary [Frontiers in Immunology, 6 September 2022]
SARS-CoV-2 Omicron infections are common among individuals who are vaccinated or have recovered from prior variant infection, but few reports have immunologically assessed serial Omicron infections. We characterized SARS-CoV-2 humoral responses in an individual who acquired laboratory-confirmed Omicron BA.1.15 ten weeks after a third dose of BNT162b2, and BA.2 thirteen weeks later. Responses were compared to 124 COVID-19-naive vaccinees. One month post-second and -third vaccine doses, the participant’s wild-type and BA.1-specific IgG, ACE2-displacement and virus neutralization activities were average for a COVID-19-naive triple-vaccinated individual. BA.1 infection boosted the participant’s responses to the cohort ≥95th percentile, but even this strong “hybrid” immunity failed to protect against BA.2. Reinfection increased BA.1 and BA.2-specific responses only modestly. Though vaccines clearly protect against severe disease, results highlight the continued importance of maintaining additional protective measures to counteract the immune-evasive Omicron variant, particularly as vaccine-induced immune responses naturally decline over time. |
Link[10] Emergence of SARS-CoV-2 Delta Variant and Effect of Nonpharmaceutical Interventions, British Columbia, Canada
Author: Y.L. Elaine Chan, Michael A. Irvine, Natalie Prystajecky, Hind Sbihi, Marsha Taylor, Yayuk Joffres, Andrea Schertzer, Caren Rose, Louise Dyson, Edward M. Hill, Michael Tildesley, John R. Tyson, Linda M.N. Hoang, Eleni Galanis Publication date: 1 October 2023 Publication info: Emerging Infectious Diseases. 2023;29(10):1999-2007. Cited by: David Price 0:04 AM 28 November 2023 GMT Citerank: (3) 701020CANMOD – PublicationsPublications by CANMOD Members144B5ACA0, 704045Covid-19859FDEF6, 715328Nonpharmaceutical Interventions (NPIs)859FDEF6 URL: DOI: https://doi.org/10.3201/eid2910.230055.
| Excerpt / Summary [Emerging Infectious Diseases, October 2023]
In British Columbia, Canada, initial growth of the SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant was slower than that reported in other jurisdictions. Delta became the dominant variant (>50% prevalence) within ≈7–13 weeks of first detection in regions within the United Kingdom and United States. In British Columbia, it remained at <10% of weekly incident COVID-19 cases for 13 weeks after first detection on March 21, 2021, eventually reaching dominance after 17 weeks. We describe the growth of Delta variant cases in British Columbia during March 1–June 30, 2021, and apply retrospective counterfactual modeling to examine factors for the initially low COVID-19 case rate after Delta introduction, such as vaccination coverage and nonpharmaceutical interventions. Growth of COVID-19 cases in the first 3 months after Delta emergence was likely limited in British Columbia because additional nonpharmaceutical interventions were implemented to reduce levels of contact at the end of March 2021, soon after variant emergence. |
Link[11] The utility of SARS-CoV-2 genomic data for informative clustering under different epidemiological scenarios and sampling
Author: Benjamin Sobkowiak, Pouya Haghmaram, Natalie Prystajecky, James E.A. Zlosnik, John Tyson, Linda M.N. Hoang, Caroline Colijn Publication date: 2 August 2023 Publication info: Infection, Genetics and Evolution, Volume 113, 2023, 105484, ISSN 1567-1348, Cited by: David Price 7:02 PM 10 December 2023 GMT Citerank: (4) 679761Caroline ColijnDr. Caroline Colijn works at the interface of mathematics, evolution, infection and public health, and leads the MAGPIE research group. She joined SFU's Mathematics Department in 2018 as a Canada 150 Research Chair in Mathematics for Infection, Evolution and Public Health. She has broad interests in applications of mathematics to questions in evolution and public health, and was a founding member of Imperial College London's Centre for the Mathematics of Precision Healthcare.10019D3ABAB, 701020CANMOD – PublicationsPublications by CANMOD Members144B5ACA0, 704045Covid-19859FDEF6, 708734Genomics859FDEF6 URL: DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meegid.2023.105484
| Excerpt / Summary [Infection, Genetics and Evolution, 2 August 2023]
Objectives: Clustering pathogen sequence data is a common practice in epidemiology to gain insights into the genetic diversity and evolutionary relationships among pathogens. We can find groups of cases with a shared transmission history and common origin, as well as identifying transmission hotspots. Motivated by the experience of clustering SARS-CoV-2 cases using whole genome sequence data during the COVID-19 pandemic to aid with public health investigation, we investigated how differences in epidemiology and sampling can influence the composition of clusters that are identified.
Methods: We performed genomic clustering on simulated SARS-CoV-2 outbreaks produced with different transmission rates and levels of genomic diversity, along with varying the proportion of cases sampled.
Results: In single outbreaks with a low transmission rate, decreasing the sampling fraction resulted in multiple, separate clusters being identified where intermediate cases in transmission chains are missed. Outbreaks simulated with a high transmission rate were more robust to changes in the sampling fraction and largely resulted in a single cluster that included all sampled outbreak cases. When considering multiple outbreaks in a sampled jurisdiction seeded by different introductions, low genomic diversity between introduced cases caused outbreaks to be merged into large clusters. If the transmission and sampling fraction, and diversity between introductions was low, a combination of the spurious break-up of outbreaks and the linking of closely related cases in different outbreaks resulted in clusters that may appear informative, but these did not reflect the true underlying population structure. Conversely, genomic clusters matched the true population structure when there was relatively high diversity between introductions and a high transmission rate.
Conclusion: Differences in epidemiology and sampling can impact our ability to identify genomic clusters that describe the underlying population structure. These findings can help to guide recommendations for the use of pathogen clustering in public health investigations. |
Link[12] Adaptability of single-nucleotide polymorphism-polymerase chain reaction (SNP-PCR) for subtyping SARS-CoV-2 and a new SNP-PCR for XBB, XBB.1.5, and B.Q.1/B.Q.1.1
Author: Gordon Ritchie, Matthew Young, Natalie Prystajecky, Marc G. Romney, Christopher F. Lowe, Nancy Matic Publication date: 14 April 2023 Publication info: Clinical Microbiology and Infection, LETTER TO THE EDITOR, VOLUME 29, ISSUE 10, P1339-1341, OCTOBER 2023 Cited by: David Price 8:10 PM 10 December 2023 GMT Citerank: (2) 701020CANMOD – PublicationsPublications by CANMOD Members144B5ACA0, 704045Covid-19859FDEF6 URL: DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2023.06.014
| Excerpt / Summary [Clinical Microbiology and Infection, 14 June 2023]
Single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP)-PCR has been proposed as a rapid, reliable and complementary method to whole-genome sequencing (WGS) for SARS-CoV-2 surveillance. The advantages of SNP-PCR include the ability of front-line clinical laboratories to easily implement the method without additional instrumentation or bioinformatics, flexibility to edit or update the SNP-PCR as new SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern (VOC) emerge, and rapid turnaround time when needed for clinical management (e.g. determining the effectiveness of monoclonal antibody therapy or investigating prolonged infection versus re-infection). From a laboratory workflow and utilization perspective, SNP-PCR also allows WGS resources to be best reserved for atypical or newly emerging strains, whereas the SNP-PCR rapidly identifies the most common and predominant VOC. Currently, public health experts are calling for prompt testing to identify new cases of the latest emerging variants: XBB, XBB.1.5 and B.Q.1/B.Q.1.1.
Our clinical virology laboratory has performed SNP-PCR for SARS-CoV-2 subtyping on positive clinical samples weekly since January 2021, using various combinations of the commercially available VirSNiP assays (TIB Molbiol, Germany) and end-point hydrolysis probe PCR, validated with WGS (Illumina MiSeq). For all samples undergoing SNP-PCR, 500 μL underwent nucleic acid extraction using MagNA Pure 96 (Roche Molecular Systems Inc., USA) into 50 μL of eluate, followed by PCR amplification according to the manufacturer's protocols using LightCycler 480 (Roche). Our SNP-PCR algorithm has evolved many times over the course of the pandemic to incorporate new mutations reflecting the latest VOC (Table 1). As readers may currently seek to implement testing protocols in their own laboratories, we describe our previous SNP-PCR algorithms for Omicron variants and the design of a new SNP-PCR to differentiate XBB, XBB.1.5 and B.Q.1/B.Q.1.1 in a single well, which has not been previously described… |
Link[13] People With Human Immunodeficiency Virus Receiving Suppressive Antiretroviral Therapy Show Typical Antibody Durability After Dual Coronavirus Disease 2019 Vaccination and Strong Third Dose Responses
Author: Hope R Lapointe, Francis Mwimanzi, Natalie Prystajecky, Zabrina L Brumme, et al. - Hope R Lapointe, Francis Mwimanzi, Peter K Cheung, Yurou Sang, Fatima Yaseen, Gisele Umviligihozo, Rebecca Kalikawe, Sarah Speckmaier, Nadia Moran-Garcia, Sneha Datwani, Maggie C Duncan, Olga Agafitei, Siobhan Ennis, Landon Young, Hesham Ali, Bruce Ganase, F Harrison Omondi, Winnie Dong, Junine Toy, Paul Sereda, Laura Burns, Cecilia T Costiniuk, Curtis Cooper, Aslam H Anis, Victor Leung, Daniel T Holmes, Mari L DeMarco, Janet Simons, Malcolm Hedgcock, Christopher F Lowe, Ralph Pantophlet, Marc G Romney, Rolando Barrios, Silvia Guillemi, Chanson J Brumme, Julio S G Montaner, Mark Hull, Marianne Harris, Masahiro Niikura, Mark A Brockman Publication date: 7 June 2023 Publication info: The Journal of Infectious Diseases, Volume 227, Issue 7, 1 April 2023, Pages 838–849 Cited by: David Price 6:32 PM 11 December 2023 GMT Citerank: (4) 701020CANMOD – PublicationsPublications by CANMOD Members144B5ACA0, 704041Vaccination859FDEF6, 704045Covid-19859FDEF6, 708761HIV859FDEF6 URL: DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jiac229
| Excerpt / Summary [The Journal of Infectious Diseases, 7 June 2022]
Background: Longer-term humoral responses to 2-dose coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines remain incompletely characterized in people living with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) (PLWH), as do initial responses to a third dose.
Methods: We measured antibodies against the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) spike protein receptor-binding domain, angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) displacement, and viral neutralization against wild-type and Omicron strains up to 6 months after 2-dose vaccination, and 1 month after the third dose, in 99 PLWH receiving suppressive antiretroviral therapy and 152 controls.
Results: Although humoral responses naturally decline after 2-dose vaccination, we found no evidence of lower antibody concentrations or faster rates of antibody decline in PLWH compared with controls after accounting for sociodemographic, health, and vaccine-related factors. We also found no evidence of poorer viral neutralization in PLWH after 2 doses, nor evidence that a low nadir CD4+ T-cell count compromised responses. Post–third-dose humoral responses substantially exceeded post–second-dose levels, though Omicron-specific responses were consistently weaker than responses against wild-type virus. Nevertheless, post–third-dose responses in PLWH were comparable to or higher than controls. An mRNA-1273 third dose was the strongest consistent correlate of higher post–third-dose responses.
Conclusion: PLWH receiving suppressive antiretroviral therapy mount strong antibody responses after 2- and 3-dose COVID-19 vaccination. Results underscore the immune benefits of third doses in light of Omicron |
Link[14] Foodborne Botulism, Canada, 2006–2021
Author: Richard A. Harris, Christine Tchao, Natalie Prystajecky, Kelly Weedmark, Yassen Tcholakov, Manon Lefebvre, John W. Austin Publication date: 1 September 2023 Publication info: Emerging Infectious Diseases, 29(9), 1730-1737. Cited by: David Price 8:36 PM 12 December 2023 GMT Citerank: (3) 701020CANMOD – PublicationsPublications by CANMOD Members144B5ACA0, 704033Enteric infections859FDEF6, 708762Food safety859FDEF6 URL: DOI: https://doi.org/10.3201/eid2909.230409
| Excerpt / Summary [Emerging Infectious Diseases, September 2023]
During 2006–2021, Canada had 55 laboratory-confirmed outbreaks of foodborne botulism, involving 67 cases. The mean annual incidence was 0.01 case/100,000 population. Foodborne botulism in Indigenous communities accounted for 46% of all cases, which is down from 85% of all cases during 1990–2005. Among all cases, 52% were caused by botulinum neurotoxin type E, but types A (24%), B (16%), F (3%), and AB (1%) also occurred; 3% were caused by undetermined serotypes. Four outbreaks resulted from commercial products, including a 2006 international outbreak caused by carrot juice. Hospital data indicated that 78% of patients were transferred to special care units and 70% required mechanical ventilation; 7 deaths were reported. Botulinum neurotoxin type A was associated with much longer hospital stays and more time spent in special care than types B or E. Foodborne botulism often is misdiagnosed. Increased clinician awareness can improve diagnosis, which can aid epidemiologic investigations and patient treatment. |
Link[15] Impact of Age and Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Breakthrough Infection on Humoral Immune Responses After Three Doses of Coronavirus Disease 2019 mRNA Vaccine
Author: Francis Mwimanzi, Hope R Lapointe, Peter K Cheung, Yurou Sang, Fatima Yaseen, Rebecca Kalikawe, Sneha Datwani, Laura Burns, Landon Young, Victor Leung, Siobhan Ennis, Chanson J Brumme, Julio S G Montaner, Winnie Dong, Natalie Prystajecky, Christopher F Lowe, Mari L DeMarco, Daniel T Holmes, Janet Simons, Masahiro Niikura, Marc G Romney, Zabrina L Brumme, Mark A Brockman Publication date: 9 February 2023 Publication info: Open Forum Infectious Diseases, Volume 10, Issue 3, March 2023, ofad073 Cited by: David Price 0:44 AM 13 December 2023 GMT Citerank: (4) 701020CANMOD – PublicationsPublications by CANMOD Members144B5ACA0, 704036Immunology859FDEF6, 704041Vaccination859FDEF6, 704045Covid-19859FDEF6 URL: DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad073
| Excerpt / Summary [Open Forum Infectious Diseases, 9 February 2023]
Background: Longer-term immune response data after 3 doses of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) mRNA vaccine remain limited, particularly among older adults and after Omicron breakthrough infection.
Methods: We quantified wild-type- and Omicron-specific serum immunoglobulin (Ig)G levels, angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 displacement activities, and live virus neutralization up to 6 months after third dose in 116 adults aged 24–98 years who remained COVID-19 naive or experienced their first severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection during this time.
Results: Among the 78 participants who remained COVID-19 naive throughout follow up, wild-type- and Omicron-BA.1-specific IgG concentrations were comparable between younger and older adults, although BA.1-specific responses were consistently significantly lower than wild-type-specific responses in both groups. Wild-type- and BA.1-specific IgG concentrations declined at similar rates in COVID-19-naive younger and older adults, with median half-lives ranging from 69 to 78 days. Antiviral antibody functions declined substantially over time in COVID-19-naive individuals, particularly in older adults: by 6 months, BA.1-specific neutralization was undetectable in 96% of older adults, versus 56% of younger adults. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection, experienced by 38 participants, boosted IgG levels and neutralization above those induced by vaccination alone. Nevertheless, BA.1-specific neutralization remained significantly lower than wild-type, with BA.5-specific neutralization lower still. Higher Omicron BA.1-specific neutralization 1 month after third dose was an independent correlate of lower SARS-CoV-2 infection risk.
Conclusions: Results underscore the immune benefits of the third COVID-19 mRNA vaccine dose in adults of all ages and identify vaccine-induced Omicron-specific neutralization as a correlate of protective immunity. Systemic antibody responses and functions however, particularly Omicron-specific neutralization, decline rapidly in COVID-19-naive individuals, particularly in older adults, supporting the need for additional booster doses. |
Link[16] Comparative Single-Dose mRNA and ChAdOx1 Vaccine Effectiveness Against Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2, Including Variants of Concern: Test-Negative Design, British Columbia, Canada
Author: Danuta M Skowronski, Solmaz Setayeshgar, Macy Zou, Natalie Prystajecky, John R Tyson, Hind Sbihi, Chris D Fjell, Eleni Galanis, Monika Naus, David M Patrick, Shiraz El Adam, May A Ahmed, Shinhye Kim, Bonnie Henry, Linda M N Hoang, Manish Sadarangani, Agatha N Jassem, Mel Krajden Publication date: 27 January 2022 Publication info: The Journal of Infectious Diseases, Volume 226, Issue 3, 1 August 2022, Pages 485–496, Published: 27 January 2022 Cited by: David Price 9:30 AM 15 December 2023 GMT Citerank: (3) 701020CANMOD – PublicationsPublications by CANMOD Members144B5ACA0, 704041Vaccination859FDEF6, 704045Covid-19859FDEF6 URL: DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jiac023
| Excerpt / Summary [The Journal of Infectious Diseases, 27 January 2022]
Background: In British Columbia, Canada, most adults 50–69 years old became eligible for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccine in April 2021, with chimpanzee adenoviral vectored vaccine (ChAdOx1) restricted to ≥55-year-olds and second doses deferred ≥6 weeks to optimize single-dose coverage.
Methods: Among adults 50–69 years old, single-dose messenger RNA (mRNA) and ChAdOx1 vaccine effectiveness (VE) against SARS-CoV-2 infection and hospitalization, including variant-specific, was assessed by test-negative design between 4 April and 2 October 2021.
Results: Single-dose VE included 11 861 cases and 99 544 controls. Median of postvaccination follow-up was 32 days (interquartile range, 15–52 days). Alpha, Gamma, and Delta variants comprised 23%, 18%, and 56%, respectively, of genetically characterized viruses. At 21–55 days postvaccination, single-dose mRNA and ChAdOx1 VE (95% confidence interval [CI]) was 74% (71%–76%) and 59% (53%–65%) against any infection and 86% (80%–90%) and 94% (85%–97%) against hospitalization, respectively. VE (95% CI) was similar against Alpha and Gamma infections for mRNA (80% [76%–84%] and 80% [75%–84%], respectively) and ChAdOx1 (69% [60%–76%] and 66% [56%–73%], respectively). mRNA VE was lower at 63% (95% CI, 56%–69%) against Delta but 85% (95% CI, 71%–92%) against Delta-associated hospitalization (nonestimable for ChAdOx1).
Conclusions: A single mRNA or ChAdOx1 vaccine dose gave important protection against SARS-CoV-2, including early variants of concern. ChAdOx1 VE was lower against infection, but 1 dose of either vaccine reduced the hospitalization risk by >85% to at least 8 weeks postvaccination. Findings inform program options, including longer dosing intervals. |
Link[17] A comparison of sampling and testing approaches for the surveillance of SARS-CoV-2 in farmed American mink
Author: Chelsea G. Himsworth, Jessica M. Caleta, Michelle Coombe, Glenna McGregor, Antonia Dibernardo, Robbin Lindsay, Inna Sekirov, Natalie Prystajecky Publication date: 27 June 2023 Publication info: Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation, Volume 35, Issue 5, June 27, 2023 Cited by: David Price 9:40 AM 15 December 2023 GMT Citerank: (4) 701020CANMOD – PublicationsPublications by CANMOD Members144B5ACA0, 703961Zoonosis859FDEF6, 704022Surveillance859FDEF6, 704045Covid-19859FDEF6 URL: DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/10406387231183685
| Excerpt / Summary [Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation, 27 June 2023]
Surveillance for SARS-CoV-2 in American mink (Neovison vison) is a global priority because outbreaks on mink farms have potential consequences for animal and public health. Surveillance programs often focus on screening natural mortalities; however, significant knowledge gaps remain regarding sampling and testing approaches. Using 76 mink from 3 naturally infected farms in British Columbia, Canada, we compared the performance of 2 reverse-transcription real-time PCR (RT-rtPCR) targets (the envelope [E] and RNA-dependent RNA polymerase [RdRp] genes) as well as serology. We also compared RT-rtPCR and sequencing results from nasopharyngeal, oropharyngeal, skin, and rectal swabs, as well as nasopharyngeal samples collected using swabs and interdental brushes. We found that infected mink were generally RT-rtPCR–positive on all samples; however, Ct values differed significantly among sample types (nasopharyngeal < oropharyngeal < skin < rectal). There was no difference in the results of nasopharyngeal samples collected using swabs or interdental brushes. For most mink (89.4%), qualitative (i.e., positive vs. negative) serology and RT-rtPCR results were concordant. However, mink were positive on RT-rtPCR and negative on serology and vice versa, and there was no significant correlation between Ct values on RT-rtPCR and percent inhibition on serology. Both the E and RdRp targets were detectable in all sample types, albeit with a small difference in Ct values. Although SARS-CoV-2 RNA can be detected in multiple sample types, passive surveillance programs in mink should focus on multiple target RT-rtPCR testing of nasopharyngeal samples in combination with serology. |
Link[18] Nasopharyngeal angiotensin converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) expression as a risk-factor for SARS-CoV-2 transmission in concurrent hospital associated outbreaks
Author: Aidan M. Nikiforuk, Kevin S. Kuchinski, Katy Short, Susan Roman, Mike A. Irvine, Natalie Prystajecky, Agatha N. Jassem, David M. Patrick, Inna Sekirov Publication date: 26 February 2024 Publication info: BMC Infectious Diseases, Volume 24, Article number: 262 (2024) Cited by: David Price 11:59 PM 14 April 2024 GMT Citerank: (3) 685420Hospitals16289D5D4, 701020CANMOD – PublicationsPublications by CANMOD Members144B5ACA0, 704045Covid-19859FDEF6 URL: DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-024-09067-9
| Excerpt / Summary [BMC Infectious Diseases, 26 February 2024]
Background: Widespread human-to-human transmission of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus two (SARS-CoV-2) stems from a strong affinity for the cellular receptor angiotensin converting enzyme two (ACE2). We investigate the relationship between a patient’s nasopharyngeal ACE2 transcription and secondary transmission within a series of concurrent hospital associated SARS-CoV-2 outbreaks in British Columbia, Canada.
Methods: Epidemiological case data from the outbreak investigations was merged with public health laboratory records and viral lineage calls, from whole genome sequencing, to reconstruct the concurrent outbreaks using infection tracing transmission network analysis. ACE2 transcription and RNA viral load were measured by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction. The transmission network was resolved to calculate the number of potential secondary cases. Bivariate and multivariable analyses using Poisson and Negative Binomial regression models was performed to estimate the association between ACE2 transcription the number of SARS-CoV-2 secondary cases.
Results: The infection tracing transmission network provided n = 76 potential transmission events across n = 103 cases. Bivariate comparisons found that on average ACE2 transcription did not differ between patients and healthcare workers (P = 0.86). High ACE2 transcription was observed in 98.6% of transmission events, either the primary or secondary case had above average ACE2. Multivariable analysis found that the association between ACE2 transcription (log2 fold-change) and the number of secondary transmission events differs between patients and healthcare workers. In health care workers Negative Binomial regression estimated that a one-unit change in ACE2 transcription decreases the number of secondary cases (β = -0.132 (95%CI: -0.255 to -0.0181) adjusting for RNA viral load. Conversely, in patients a one-unit change in ACE2 transcription increases the number of secondary cases (β = 0.187 (95% CI: 0.0101 to 0.370) adjusting for RNA viral load. Sensitivity analysis found no significant relationship between ACE2 and secondary transmission in health care workers and confirmed the positive association among patients.
Conclusion: Our study suggests that ACE2 transcription has a positive association with SARS-CoV-2 secondary transmission in admitted inpatients, but not health care workers in concurrent hospital associated outbreaks, and it should be further investigated as a risk-factor for viral transmission. |
|
|