Connectionist objection to Tye's theory
Theory's flawed by its classical conception of memory as storage. Memory isn't stored in a classical representational manner, but is reactivated in a connectionist dispositional fashion, based on the strength of connections between processing nodes.
Argument anticipated by Michael Tye, 1991.
CONTEXT(Help)
-
Artificial Intelligence »Artificial Intelligence
▲
Can computers think? [1] »Can computers think? [1]
▲
No: computers can't understand images [5b] »No: computers can't understand images [5b]
▲
Images represented by filled cells in an array »Images represented by filled cells in an array
▲
Images are interpreted symbol-filled arrays »Images are interpreted symbol-filled arrays
■
Connectionist objection to Tye's theory
●
Connectionism doesn't accommodate all evidence »Connectionism doesn't accommodate all evidence
●
Tye's imagery can accommodate connectionist memory »Tye's imagery can accommodate connectionist memory
+Comments (0)
+Citations (0)
+About