Views
Graph
Explorer
Focus
Down
Load 1 level
Load 2 levels
Load 3 levels
Load 4 levels
Load all levels
All
Dagre
Focus
Down
Load 1 level
Load 2 levels
Load 3 levels
Load 4 level
Load all levels
All
Tree
SpaceTree
Focus
Expanding
Load 1 level
Load 2 levels
Load 3 levels
Down
All
Down
Radial
Focus
Expanding
Load 1 level
Load 2 levels
Load 3 levels
Down
All
Down
Box
Focus
Expanding
Down
Up
All
Down
Page ✓
Article
Outline
Document
Down
All
Canvas
Time
Timeline
Calendar
Request email digest
Past 24 hours
Past 2 days
Past 3 days
Past week
Add
Add page
Add comment
Add citation
Edit
Edit page
Delete page
Share
Link
Bookmark
Embed
Social media
Login
Member login
Register now for a free account
🔎
Symbol systems approach is worldview not a theory
OpposingArgument
1
#498
Metaphors (eg inside/outside) are core to the symbol systems approach, and are a worldview that provides a framework explaining the facts rather than explanations themselves (eg of interactional entities that are neither external nor internal).
The symbol systems worldview can't explain interactional entities that don't, strictly speaking, belong to the external world or to the internal mind.
Phillip E. Agre (1993).
CONTEXT
(Help)
-
Artificial Intelligence »
Artificial Intelligence
Artificial Intelligence☜A collaboratively editable version of Robert Horns brilliant and pioneering debate map Can Computers Think?—exploring 50 years of philosophical argument about the possibility of computer thought.☜F1CEB7
▲
Can computers think? [1] »
Can computers think? [1]
Can computers think? [1]☜Can a computational system possess all important elements of human thinking or understanding? ☜FFB597
▲
Yes: physical symbol systems can think [3] »
Yes: physical symbol systems can think [3]
Yes: physical symbol systems can think [3]☜Thinking is a rule governed manipulation of symbolic representational structures. In humans, symbol systems are instantiated in the brain, but the same symbol systems can also be instantiated in a computer. ☜59C6EF
▲
The Representationalist Assumption »
The Representationalist Assumption
The Representationalist Assumption☜Symbol structures are internal representations of external reality, made up of symbols and operated on by psychological processes (inc. rules and search). Theyre constituent in that their meaning is a function of the meaning of their parts.☜98CE71
▲
The representational tradition is flawed »
The representational tradition is flawed
The representational tradition is flawed☜Classical symbolic AI places too much emphasis on the role of representations in human intelligence. Acutal human thinking only becomes symbolic and representational when normal modes of cognition break down.☜EF597B
▲
The Situated Action Paradigm »
The Situated Action Paradigm
The Situated Action Paradigm☜This approach to artificial intelligence emphasizes the situated and embodied character of cognition, and the role of affordances in the acquisition of perceptual information and the control of behaviour.☜98CE71
▲
The mechanisms situated action describes are symbol systems »
The mechanisms situated action describes are symbol systems
The mechanisms situated action describes are symbol systems☜All of the mechanisms suggested by the situation action program can be interpreted as physical symbol systems. The claims of situated action have been achieved in existing symbolic models.☜EF597B
■
Symbol systems approach is worldview not a theory
Symbol systems approach is worldview not a theory☜Metaphors (eg inside/outside) are core to the symbol systems approach, and are a worldview that provides a framework explaining the facts rather than explanations themselves (eg of interactional entities that are neither external nor internal).☜EF597B
●
The worldview criticism misses the point »
The worldview criticism misses the point
The worldview criticism misses the point☜Vera and Simon do present the symbols systems approach as a worldview. But their criticisms of situated action are specific and address several principal theses propounded by the situated action school.☜EF597B
Heading
Summary
Click the button to enter task scheduling information
Open
Details
Enter task details
Message text
Select assignee(s)
Due date (click calendar)
RadDatePicker
RadDatePicker
Open the calendar popup.
Calendar
Title and navigation
Title and navigation
<<
<
October 2024
>
<<
October 2024
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
40
29
30
1
2
3
4
5
41
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
42
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
43
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
44
27
28
29
30
31
1
2
45
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Reminder
No reminder
1 day before due
2 days before due
3 days before due
1 week before due
Ready to post
Copy to text
Enter
Cancel
Task assignment(s) have been emailed and cannot now be altered
Lock
Cancel
Save
Comment graphing options
Choose comments:
Comment only
Whole thread
All comments
Choose location:
To a new map
To this map
New map options
Select map ontology
Options
Standard (default) ontology
College debate ontology
Hypothesis ontology
Influence diagram ontology
Story ontology
Graph to private map
Cancel
Proceed
+Comments (
0
)
- Comments
Add a comment
Newest first
Oldest first
Show threads
+Citations (
0
)
- Citations
Add new citation
List by:
Citerank
Map
+About
- About
Entered by:-
David Price
NodeID:
#498
Node type:
OpposingArgument
Entry date (GMT):
7/6/2006 9:39:00 PM
Last edit date (GMT):
10/23/2007 4:19:00 PM
Show other editors
Incoming cross-relations:
0
Outgoing cross-relations:
0
Average rating:
0
by
0
users
x
Select file to upload