( - ) ℋ Id(entity)
_209 ; oType = "Resolution" ; (Maybe positioned inconsistently)Resolved: This debate graph software is a useful Epistemology tool, in addition to being a useful tool for informed debates; the purpose for which it was developed.
wp:Epistemology

(Information in) the Details tab of this graph Is being structured as ...

  1. Content Specific points
  2. Content related explanations
  3. Planned Content expansion Tasks

 


Since this "Why" type of Node appears at the top of the Search list displayed by default when "map_home" is used, it is a good place for "initial" information such as ...

  • Introductory (Lede) comments.
  • Current Priorities ( Why = Deadlines )
  • This might be a good place to enumerate EntryPoints since it appears near the top of the lists.
  • Maps that are "by invitation" should be listed here as an implicit solicitation for Community members.
  • Notes regarding DebateGraph uses are likely to support use for SR & ED, especially given the need to "bootstrap" and continuously revise the organization of Graphs for various Audiences.

 


DebateGraph uses in this context ...

  • Communication
  • Knowledge management
    • incremental learning
  • Work breakdown
  • Clarification of Issues
  • ...

Work in process (Wip) notes ...

  • "Capture first, then re-factor" is a useful methodology.
  • Use KeepH for easy scheduled access to specific Nodes
  • "Reduce scrolling" is generally a valid objective.
  • find out if I can now delete Bookmarks.

^

CONTEXT(Help)
-
202?-Ð( 丑 ) »202?-Ð( 丑 )
Identity »Identity
ℋ »
( - ) ℋ Id(entity)
/ = Content(?) ( X NamesH ; ⌘ = place ) ; 面 = Dimension »/ = Content(?) ( X NamesH ; ⌘ = place ) ; 面 = Dimension
`- »`-
⌱ = Origin (mathematics) »⌱ = Origin (mathematics)
Interpretationℋ  »Interpretationℋ
twitter »twitter
🔝  »🔝
🆔ℋ »🆔ℋ
🆔 Id(entity) »🆔 Id(entity)
who.ID »who.ID
+Comments (0)
+Citations (0)
+About