26b Criteria 3: Ownership
Paragraph 26b contains seven criteria that would be used to determine when used equipment "should not normally be considered waste". Different actors took a variety of positions on one or several of these seven criteria.

Criteria 3 reads:

" Used equipment and their components and any residual waste, materials, and products shall continue to be owned or controlled by the exporter (with or without third parties involved in implementation) throughout the export, transit, import, testing, repair, and refurbishment processes, until they are either tested, fully functional equipment or components and are made available for direct reuse, or as resulting scrap/waste disposed of according to [Criteria 6]"

From p. 11 of Basel Secretariat. 2014. ‘Draft Technical Guidelines on Transboundary Movements of Electronic and Electrical Waste and Used Electrical and Electronic Equipment, in Particular Regarding the Distinction between Waste and Non-Waste under the Basel Convention (Draft of 20 November 2014)’.

CONTEXT(Help)
-
Electronic Waste »Electronic Waste
Draft Technical Guidelines »Draft Technical Guidelines
Issues »Issues
Situations in which used equipment is or is not waste »Situations in which used equipment is or is not waste
Paragraph 26: when used equipment should not be considered waste »Paragraph 26: when used equipment should not be considered waste
26b "Preferred option" »26b "Preferred option"
26b Criteria 3: Ownership
Not acceptable to treat all unuseable equipment as waste »Not acceptable to treat all unuseable equipment as waste
Basel Action Network »Basel Action Network
+Comments (0)
+Citations (0)
+About