Vulnerable to counter-examples
Whether behaviorally or operationally interpreted, the Turing test is vulnerable to cases where unthinking machines pass the test or unthinking machines fail it.

But, if the Turing test is interpreted as a source of inductive evidence, then such counter-examples can be accommodated.

James Moor, 1976 and 1987.

Supported by "The Inductive Evidence Interpretation".

CONTEXT(Help)
-
Artificial Intelligence »Artificial Intelligence
▲
Can the Turing Test determine this? [2]  »Can the Turing Test determine this? [2] 
▲
Yes: defines intelligence operationally/behaviorally »Yes: defines intelligence operationally/behaviorally
■
Vulnerable to counter-examples
►
No: failing the Test is not decisive »No: failing the Test is not decisive
►
No: passing the Test is not decisive »No: passing the Test is not decisive
►
Can inductive evidence determine this? »Can inductive evidence determine this?
◄
James Moor »James Moor
+Comments (0)
+Citations (0)
+About