The water-seeker thought experiment
Imagine a complete science of neurophysiology can determine the existence of a thought via a brain-o-scope—and a person possesses the "I want water" thought neurophysiology but can't become conscious of the thought.
The connection principle is then disproved by example.

Argument anticipated by John Searle (1990a).
Artificial Intelligence »Artificial Intelligence
Can computers think? [1] »Can computers think? [1]
No: computers can't be conscious [6] »No: computers can't be conscious [6]
Consciousness is necessary to thought »Consciousness is necessary to thought
The Connection Principle »The Connection Principle
The water-seeker thought experiment
Water-thought must be accessible to consciousness »Water-thought must be accessible to consciousness
+Comments (0)
+Citations (0)