Criteria for equipment not to be considered waste

This group of arguments presupposes two premises:

1) A declaration is made that the shipment contains no waste.

2) That a shipment is appropriately packaged to protect from damage.

These premises are articulated in Section III, A, 24(c) and (d) o:f:

Basel Secretariat. 2012. ‘Draft Technical Guidelines on Transboundary Movement of E-Waste, in Particular Regarding the Distinction between Waste and Non-Waste (Version of 27 September 2012)’. http://www.basel.int/Portals/4/download.aspx?d=UNEP-CHW-OEWG.8-INF-9-Rev.1.English.doc.

CONTEXT(Help)
-
Electronic Waste »Electronic Waste
▲
Draft Technical Guidelines »Draft Technical Guidelines
▲
Issues »Issues
▲
Situations in which used equipment is or is not waste »Situations in which used equipment is or is not waste
■
Criteria for equipment not to be considered waste
●
Exemptions for some situations are needed »Exemptions for some situations are needed
●
Defective and return is to producer »Defective and return is to producer
●
Must allow trade between Annex VII and non-Annex VII »Must allow trade between Annex VII and non-Annex VII
●
Must prohibit trade from Annex VII to non-Annex VII »Must prohibit trade from Annex VII to non-Annex VII
●
Use Basel Convention Article 4.1 to decide waste/non-waste »Use Basel Convention Article 4.1 to decide waste/non-waste
●
Used equipent has at least 1/3 of its normal life span remaining »Used equipent has at least 1/3 of its normal life span remaining
●
Used equipment returned to producer »Used equipment returned to producer
●
Used professional equipment returned to producer »Used professional equipment returned to producer
►
2012-09 Draft Technical Guidelines [2012 Sep] »2012-09 Draft Technical Guidelines [2012 Sep]
►
Paragraph 26: when used equipment should not be considered waste »Paragraph 26: when used equipment should not be considered waste
+Comments (0)
+Citations (0)
+About