Views
Graph
Explorer
Focus
Down
Load 1 level
Load 2 levels
Load 3 levels
Load 4 levels
Load all levels
All
Dagre
Focus
Down
Load 1 level
Load 2 levels
Load 3 levels
Load 4 level
Load all levels
All
Tree
SpaceTree
Focus
Expanding
Load 1 level
Load 2 levels
Load 3 levels
Down
All
Down
Radial
Focus
Expanding
Load 1 level
Load 2 levels
Load 3 levels
Down
All
Down
Box
Focus
Expanding
Down
Up
All
Down
Page ✓
Article
Outline
Document
Down
All
Canvas
Time
Timeline
Calendar
Request email digest
Past 24 hours
Past 2 days
Past 3 days
Past week
Add
Add page
Add comment
Add citation
Edit
Edit page
Delete page
Share
Link
Bookmark
Embed
Social media
Login
Member login
Register now for a free account
🔎
Maintenance, Refurbishment, Repair
ArgumentGroup
1
#462159
A set of positions relating to maintenance, refurbishment, repair and associated activities.
CONTEXT
(Help)
-
Electronic Waste »
Electronic Waste
Electronic Waste☜An issue map of electronic waste as a matter of concern.☜F1CEB7
▲
Draft Technical Guidelines »
Draft Technical Guidelines
Draft Technical Guidelines☜An issue map of the negotiations over the design of Technical Guidelines on transboundary movement of e-waste, in particular regarding the distinction between waste and non-waste.☜9FDDBE
▲
Issues »
Issues
Issues☜☜FFB597
▲
Situations in which used equipment is or is not waste »
Situations in which used equipment is or is not waste
Situations in which used equipment is or is not waste☜☜FFB597
■
Maintenance, Refurbishment, Repair
Maintenance, Refurbishment, Repair☜A set of positions relating to maintenance, refurbishment, repair and associated activities.☜FF6D31
●
Consistency with EU WEEE Recast needed »
Consistency with EU WEEE Recast needed
Consistency with EU WEEE Recast needed☜☜59C6EF
●
Enable legitimate reuse/repair »
Enable legitimate reuse/repair
Enable legitimate reuse/repair☜☜59C6EF
●
Inappropriate to apply waste regulations to repair and refurbishment »
Inappropriate to apply waste regulations to repair and refurbishment
Inappropriate to apply waste regulations to repair and refurbishment☜☜59C6EF
●
Not economical to have OEM repair centres in every country »
Not economical to have OEM repair centres in every country
Not economical to have OEM repair centres in every country☜A position that supports the position that there should be exemptions for some situations in which non-waste equipment can be shipped for repair, refurbishment and/or reuse. The argument holds that it would be uneconomical to establish OEM or third-party repair centres in every country simply to avoid transboundary shipments of equipment for repair, refurbishment, and/or reuse.☜59C6EF
●
Reuse needs clarification. »
Reuse needs clarification.
Reuse needs clarification.☜A position that Annex IX B1110 of the Basel Convention causes confusion where it states that re-use can include repair, refurbishment or upgrading, but not major reassembly yet does not define what counts as major re-assembly.☜59C6EF
●
Shipments for maintenance, repair, or refurbishment are not wastes »
Shipments for maintenance, repair, or refurbishment are not wastes
Shipments for maintenance, repair, or refurbishment are not wastes☜A position that holds that transboundary shipments of equipment destined for activities such as routine maintenance, repair, upgrading, servicing, or refurbishing should not cont as waste.☜59C6EF
●
Shipments under warranty/lease/product servicing are not waste »
Shipments under warranty/lease/product servicing are not waste
Shipments under warranty/lease/product servicing are not waste☜A position that holds that transboundary shipments of used equipment should not be considered waste if the shipment constitutes warranty/lease/product servicing returns from a producer to the original producer, original component supplier, or a contract agent completing warranty/lease/product servicing activity on behalf of an original producer.☜59C6EF
►
Exemptions for some situations are needed »
Exemptions for some situations are needed
Exemptions for some situations are needed☜☜FFFACD
►
2012-05 Draft Technical Guidelines [2012 May] »
2012-05 Draft Technical Guidelines [2012 May]
2012-05 Draft Technical Guidelines [2012 May]☜☜FFFACD
◄
Exemptions for some situations are needed »
Exemptions for some situations are needed
Exemptions for some situations are needed☜☜FFFACD
Heading
Summary
Click the button to enter task scheduling information
Open
Details
Enter task details
Message text
Select assignee(s)
Due date (click calendar)
RadDatePicker
RadDatePicker
Open the calendar popup.
Calendar
Title and navigation
Title and navigation
<<
<
November 2024
>
<<
November 2024
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
44
27
28
29
30
31
1
2
45
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
46
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
47
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
48
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
49
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Reminder
No reminder
1 day before due
2 days before due
3 days before due
1 week before due
Ready to post
Copy to text
Enter
Cancel
Task assignment(s) have been emailed and cannot now be altered
Lock
Cancel
Save
Comment graphing options
Choose comments:
Comment only
Whole thread
All comments
Choose location:
To a new map
To this map
New map options
Select map ontology
Options
Standard (default) ontology
College debate ontology
Hypothesis ontology
Influence diagram ontology
Story ontology
Graph to private map
Cancel
Proceed
+Comments (
0
)
- Comments
Add a comment
Newest first
Oldest first
Show threads
+Citations (
0
)
- Citations
Add new citation
List by:
Citerank
Map
+About
- About
Entered by:-
Josh Lepawsky
NodeID:
#462159
Node type:
ArgumentGroup
Entry date (GMT):
1/12/2017 3:42:00 PM
Last edit date (GMT):
1/12/2017 3:43:00 PM
Show other editors
Incoming cross-relations:
1
Outgoing cross-relations:
2
Average rating:
0
by
0
users
x
Select file to upload