Tacit knowledge doesn't explain the results
Neuroimaging results can't be explained by appeal to tacit knowledge.
Kosslyn and Thompson (2003).
CONTEXT(Help)
-
Artificial Intelligence »Artificial Intelligence
▲
Can computers think? [1] »Can computers think? [1]
▲
No: computers can't understand images [5b] »No: computers can't understand images [5b]
▲
Images represented by filled cells in an array »Images represented by filled cells in an array
▲
Images are Quasi-pictorial representations »Images are Quasi-pictorial representations
▲
Image Psychology »Image Psychology
▲
Experimental evidence »Experimental evidence
▲
Neuroimaging evidence »Neuroimaging evidence
■
Tacit knowledge doesn't explain the results
●
Activation of early visual cortex »Activation of early visual cortex
●
Participants can't influence brain areas voluntarily »Participants can't influence brain areas voluntarily
●
Participants not aware of relevant brain areas »Participants not aware of relevant brain areas
►
Argument undermined by neuroimaging evidence »Argument undermined by neuroimaging evidence
+Comments (0)
+Citations (0)
+About