Gödel limits formal systems not machine implementations
Physical machines that can implement numerous formal systems transcend the limitations that Gödel’s theorem places upon formal systems.
The Gödel sentence for some formal system only limits a machine while it is implementing that formal system. But when the machine is implementing some other formal system, the machine may be able to prove the previous system's Gödel sentence.

Daniel Dennett (1972).


Notes
:
  • Dennett presents this argument as a special case in his broader discussion of how a physical object can implement various Turing machines.
  • Also see the "Is the brain a computer?" arguments on Map 1, the "Functional states generate consciousness?" argument on Map 6, and sidebar "Formal Systems: An Overview" on this map.
CONTEXT(Help)
-
Artificial Intelligence »Artificial Intelligence
Are thinking computers mathematically possible? [7] »Are thinking computers mathematically possible? [7]
No: computers are limited by Gödel's theorems »No: computers are limited by Gödel's theorems
Gödel limits formal systems not machine implementations
Highly flexible systems aren't mechanistic »Highly flexible systems aren't mechanistic
Daniel Dennett »Daniel Dennett
+Comments (0)
+Citations (0)
+About