Guidelines should not include a reference to Ban Amendment.
“We join the views expressed by Japan, Canada and Australia at the Basel Convention’s OEWG-8 [Open Ended Working Group 8] that a reference to the Ban Amendment should not be included in Paragraph 16 [regarding ‘Control procedure for transboundary movements’].”

From p. 8 of of response by United States to Basel Secretariat. 2012. ‘Draft Technical Guidelines on Transboundary Movement of E-Waste, in Particular Regarding the Distinction between Waste and Non-Waste (Version of 27 September 2012)’. http://www.basel.int/Portals/4/download.aspx?d=UNEP-CHW-OEWG.8-INF-9-Rev.1.English.doc.
CONTEXT(Help)
-
Electronic Waste »Electronic Waste
Draft Technical Guidelines »Draft Technical Guidelines
Issues »Issues
Scope of Technical Guidelines needs clarification »Scope of Technical Guidelines needs clarification
Guidelines should support BAN Amendment. »Guidelines should support BAN Amendment.
Guidelines should not include a reference to Ban Amendment.
2012-09 Draft Technical Guidelines [2012 Sep] »2012-09 Draft Technical Guidelines [2012 Sep]
United States »United States
+Comments (0)
+Citations (0)
+About