Are we at risk of "changing subject" here? Issue1 #440336 An idea, itself is a Subject; it is an event *ideated* somewhere. Then, the idea has *aboutness*, which could be either a single subject (parent node is about the concept (subject) labeled "idea". |
The parent node asserts a triple {idea, can have, multiple representations} But, that parent node is a triple, an assertion. It is asserting that some subject, labeled "idea" exists in a relationship with multiple representations [of it] -- being the same subject. So, what, really, is the meaning of the assertion unless there is an entailed change of subject with each different representation? |
Edit details | | Page view |
Show >>Citations0Comments0HistoryInfo<< Hide |