Views
Graph
Explorer
Focus
Down
Load 1 level
Load 2 levels
Load 3 levels
Load 4 levels
Load all levels
All
Dagre
Focus
Down
Load 1 level
Load 2 levels
Load 3 levels
Load 4 level
Load all levels
All
Tree
SpaceTree
Focus
Expanding
Load 1 level
Load 2 levels
Load 3 levels
Down
All
Down
Radial
Focus
Expanding
Load 1 level
Load 2 levels
Load 3 levels
Down
All
Down
Box
Focus
Expanding
Down
Up
All
Down
Page ✓
Article
Outline
Document
Down
All
Canvas
Time
Timeline
Calendar
Request email digest
Past 24 hours
Past 2 days
Past 3 days
Past week
Add
Add page
Add comment
Add citation
Edit
Edit page
Delete page
Share
Link
Bookmark
Embed
Social media
Login
Member login
Register now for a free account
🔎
Combinatorial explosion is invalid in a Patterns In Contexts model.
Premise
1
#291
Information can be represented metaphorically as patterns in contexts. This dramatically reduces the complexity of all problems, and makes the "combinatorial explosion" model invalid and unnecessary in any form of intelligence.
Argument anticipated by Ned Block, 1981.
CONTEXT
(Help)
-
Artificial Intelligence »
Artificial Intelligence
Artificial Intelligence☜A collaboratively editable version of Robert Horns brilliant and pioneering debate map Can Computers Think?—exploring 50 years of philosophical argument about the possibility of computer thought.☜F1CEB7
▲
Can the Turing Test determine this? [2] »
Can the Turing Test determine this? [2]
Can the Turing Test determine this? [2] ☜Is the Turing Test—proposed by Alan Turing in 1950—an adequate test of thinking? Can it determine whether a machine can think? If a computer passess the test by persuading judges via a teletyped conversation that its human can it be said to think?☜FFB597
▲
No: but Neo-Turing test is adequate »
No: but Neo-Turing test is adequate
No: but Neo-Turing test is adequate☜The neo-Turing test interprets the Turing test as providing an overt, measurable behavioural and operational definition of thinking—and refines the test to avoid classical problems associated with behaviourism and other related criticisms.☜59C6EF
▲
The Psychologism Objection »
The Psychologism Objection
The Psychologism Objection☜Behaviour by itself isnt enough: internal differences matter. If two systems behave in exactly the same way, one might be intelligent while the other is stupid because of differences in the way each system processes information.☜EF597B
▲
All Possible Conversations Machine »
All Possible Conversations Machine
All Possible Conversations Machine☜An unintelligent machine engaging in sensible conversation by searching a database containing all possible lines of conversation in a finite Turing test, would pass the neo-Turing test—but it would be only echoing its programmers intelligence.☜98CE71
■
Combinatorial explosion is invalid in a Patterns In Contexts model.
Combinatorial explosion is invalid in a Patterns In Contexts model.☜Information can be represented metaphorically as patterns in contexts. This dramatically reduces the complexity of all problems, and makes the combinatorial explosion model invalid and unnecessary in any form of intelligence.☜FF97FF
●
Combinatorial explosion of knowledge »
Combinatorial explosion of knowledge
Combinatorial explosion of knowledge☜Representing all of the information relevant to an open-ended domain, or to human commonsense understanding in general, is an impossible task, because it results in a combinatorial explosion of relevant information. ☜98CE71
●
Machine is logically possible »
Machine is logically possible
Machine is logically possible☜The machine is logically possible even if it is empirically impossible. Because the neo-Turing test makes a claim about the concept of intelligence, it is refuted by the logical possibility of the machine.☜EF597B
Heading
Summary
Click the button to enter task scheduling information
Open
Details
Enter task details
Message text
Select assignee(s)
Due date (click calendar)
RadDatePicker
RadDatePicker
Open the calendar popup.
Calendar
Title and navigation
Title and navigation
<<
<
October 2024
>
<<
October 2024
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
40
29
30
1
2
3
4
5
41
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
42
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
43
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
44
27
28
29
30
31
1
2
45
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Reminder
No reminder
1 day before due
2 days before due
3 days before due
1 week before due
Ready to post
Copy to text
Enter
Cancel
Task assignment(s) have been emailed and cannot now be altered
Lock
Cancel
Save
Comment graphing options
Choose comments:
Comment only
Whole thread
All comments
Choose location:
To a new map
To this map
New map options
Select map ontology
Options
Standard (default) ontology
College debate ontology
Hypothesis ontology
Influence diagram ontology
Story ontology
Graph to private map
Cancel
Proceed
+Comments (
1
)
- Comments
Add a comment
Newest first
Oldest first
Show threads
+Citations (
0
)
- Citations
Add new citation
List by:
Citerank
Map
+About
- About
Entered by:-
David Price
NodeID:
#291
Node type:
PartArgument
Entry date (GMT):
6/15/2006 2:58:00 PM
Last edit date (GMT):
4/6/2013 5:33:00 AM
Show other editors
Incoming cross-relations:
0
Outgoing cross-relations:
0
Average rating:
0
by
0
users
x
Select file to upload