Details view: George Lakoff

Views
Add
Edit
- Edit page
- Delete page
Share
Login
- Member login
- Register now for a free account
🔎

George Lakoff Protagonist1 #2779 Arguments advanced by George Lakoff.

CONTEXT(Help)

Artificial Intelligence »Artificial IntelligenceArtificial Intelligence☜A collaboratively editable version of Robert Horns brilliant and pioneering debate map Can Computers Think?—exploring 50 years of philosophical argument about the possibility of computer thought.☜F1CEB7

▲

Protagonists »ProtagonistsProtagonists☜The contributions of over 300 protagonists can be explored via a surname search, or using the growing list developing here.☜D3B8AB

■

George LakoffGeorge Lakoff☜Arguments advanced by George Lakoff.☜D3B8AB

►

The sensorimotor system »The sensorimotor systemThe sensorimotor system☜The subsymbolic paradigm, supplemented by an account of the body’s role in meaningful cognition, overcomes problems that plague classical AI (see detailed text).☜FFFACD

►

AI models lack feature of embodiment of concepts »AI models lack feature of embodiment of conceptsAI models lack feature of embodiment of concepts☜Evidence suggests the body is involved in many processess that are considered to be pure information processing in classical AI—processes include: basic-level concepts, kinesthetic image schemas, and the experiential basis of metaphorical concepts.☜FFFACD

►

Predicate calculus can't capture human reasoning »Predicate calculus can't capture human reasoningPredicate calculus can't capture human reasoning☜Many knowledge-based systems encode informaiton with some version of predicate calculus, which is based on the classical concept of a category. But the classical veiw of categories has been disproved by empirical evidence. ☜FFFACD

►

Objectivism conflicts with natural human categories »Objectivism conflicts with natural human categoriesObjectivism conflicts with natural human categories☜The objectivist paradigm rests on a classical theory of categories that is disproved by a wide body of empirical evidence concerning basic level concepts, kinesthetic image schemas, metaphorical concepts, metonymic models, and others.☜FFFACD

►

Key information can be lost in translation »Key information can be lost in translationKey information can be lost in translation☜Different conceptual systems have different conceptual organisations, and those differences are cognitively significant. If the different organsations are translated into a universal conceptual framework, significant differences are eliminated. ☜FFFACD

Heading

Summary

Click the button to enter task scheduling information

Details

Enter task details

Message text

Select assignee(s)

Due date (click calendar)

RadDatePicker

Open the calendar popup.

Calendar

Title and navigation
Title and navigation
<<	<	April 2024	>	<<

April 2024
	S	M	T	W	T	F	S
14	31	1	2	3	4	5	6
15	7	8	9	10	11	12	13
16	14	15	16	17	18	19	20
17	21	22	23	24	25	26	27
18	28	29	30	1	2	3	4
19	5	6	7	8	9	10	11

Reminder

Ready to post Copy to text

Task assignment(s) have been emailed and cannot now be altered

Lock

Comment graphing options

Choose comments:Comment onlyWhole threadAll comments

Choose location:To a new mapTo this map

New map options

Select map ontology Graph to private map

+Comments (0)

- CommentsAdd a commentNewest firstOldest firstShow threads

+Citations (0)

- CitationsAdd new citationList by: CiterankMap

+About

- About

Entered by:- David Price
NodeID: #2779
Node type: Protagonist
Entry date (GMT): 7/20/2007 6:13:00 PM
Last edit date (GMT): 7/20/2007 6:13:00 PM
Show other editors
Incoming cross-relations: 0
Outgoing cross-relations: 5
Average rating: 0 by 0 users

x Select file to upload