Views
Graph
Explorer
Focus
Down
Load 1 level
Load 2 levels
Load 3 levels
Load 4 levels
Load all levels
All
Dagre
Focus
Down
Load 1 level
Load 2 levels
Load 3 levels
Load 4 level
Load all levels
All
Tree
SpaceTree
Focus
Expanding
Load 1 level
Load 2 levels
Load 3 levels
Down
All
Down
Radial
Focus
Expanding
Load 1 level
Load 2 levels
Load 3 levels
Down
All
Down
Box
Focus
Expanding
Down
Up
All
Down
Page ✓
Article
Outline
Document
Down
All
Canvas
Time
Timeline
Calendar
Request email digest
Past 24 hours
Past 2 days
Past 3 days
Past week
Add
Add page
Add comment
Add citation
Edit
Edit page
Delete page
Share
Link
Bookmark
Embed
Social media
Login
Member login
Register now for a free account
🔎
Priority should be given to SMEs and community groups
Component
1
#20114
Priority should be given to SMEs and community groups so that the funding can have the double benefit of capacity building, rather than flow out to large generic firms.
CONTEXT
(Help)
-
Declaration on Public Services 2.0 »
Declaration on Public Services 2.0
Declaration on Public Services 2.0☜In November 2009, an EU Minsterial Declaration will spell out EU eGovernment policy for the next three years. Help us co-create a bottom up open Public Services 2.0 declaration alongside it.☜F1CEB7
▲
Procurement »
Procurement
Procurement☜Policy recommendations broadly around the theme of procurement.☜FFB597
▲
Review procurement processes »
Review procurement processes
Review procurement processes☜Procurement should be more flexible and work in partnership with those delivering services to create co-developed solutions, rather than play guesswork games with unspecified budgets and anonymous selection processes that waste everybodys time and money.☜59C6EF
■
Priority should be given to SMEs and community groups
Priority should be given to SMEs and community groups☜Priority should be given to SMEs and community groups so that the funding can have the double benefit of capacity building, rather than flow out to large generic firms.☜9FDEF6
Heading
Summary
Click the button to enter task scheduling information
Open
Details
Enter task details
Message text
Select assignee(s)
Due date (click calendar)
RadDatePicker
RadDatePicker
Open the calendar popup.
Calendar
Title and navigation
Title and navigation
<<
<
May 2024
>
<<
May 2024
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
18
28
29
30
1
2
3
4
19
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
20
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
21
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
22
26
27
28
29
30
31
1
23
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Reminder
No reminder
1 day before due
2 days before due
3 days before due
1 week before due
Ready to post
Copy to text
Enter
Cancel
Task assignment(s) have been emailed and cannot now be altered
Lock
Cancel
Save
Comment graphing options
Choose comments:
Comment only
Whole thread
All comments
Choose location:
To a new map
To this map
New map options
Select map ontology
Options
Standard (default) ontology
College debate ontology
Hypothesis ontology
Influence diagram ontology
Story ontology
Graph to private map
Cancel
Proceed
+Comments (
0
)
- Comments
Add a comment
Newest first
Oldest first
Show threads
+Citations (
1
)
- Citations
Add new citation
List by:
Citerank
Map
Link
[1]
Author:
Lee Bryant
Cited by:
David Price
5:31 PM 13 June 2009 GMT
Citerank:
(1)
20113
Review procurement processes
Procurement should be more flexible and work in partnership with those delivering services to create co-developed solutions, rather than play guesswork games with unspecified budgets and anonymous selection processes that waste everybody's time and money.
9
59C6EF
URL:
http://eups20.uservoice.com/pages/15029-policy-recommendations-for-public-services-2-0/suggestions/218143-review-procurement-processes
+About
- About
Entered by:-
David Price
NodeID:
#20114
Node type:
Component
Entry date (GMT):
6/13/2009 5:30:00 PM
Last edit date (GMT):
6/13/2009 5:55:00 PM
Show other editors
Incoming cross-relations:
0
Outgoing cross-relations:
0
Average rating:
2
by
1
users
x
Select file to upload