Views
Graph
Explorer
Focus
Down
Load 1 level
Load 2 levels
Load 3 levels
Load 4 levels
Load all levels
All
Dagre
Focus
Down
Load 1 level
Load 2 levels
Load 3 levels
Load 4 level
Load all levels
All
Tree
SpaceTree
Focus
Expanding
Load 1 level
Load 2 levels
Load 3 levels
Down
All
Down
Radial
Focus
Expanding
Load 1 level
Load 2 levels
Load 3 levels
Down
All
Down
Box
Focus
Expanding
Down
Up
All
Down
Page ✓
Article
Outline
Document
Down
All
Canvas
Time
Timeline
Calendar
Request email digest
Past 24 hours
Past 2 days
Past 3 days
Past week
Add
Add page
Add comment
Add citation
Edit
Edit page
Delete page
Share
Link
Bookmark
Embed
Social media
Login
Member login
Register now for a free account
🔎
Closes off emergent requirements as new stakeholders come on board
TegenArgument
1
#6487
If the decisions are locked down, then if new people join the group, their needs might not be met
PAGE NAVIGATOR
(Help)
-
ESSENCE 2009 planning issues »
ESSENCE 2009 planning issues
ESSENCE 2009 planning issues☜Deliberation over the structure and process of the envisaged ESSENCE 2009 experiment. ☜F1CEB7
▲
What could/should drive group formation? »
What could/should drive group formation?
What could/should drive group formation?☜There are a number of ways of driving the formation of the groups who participate in the experiment to conduct deliberations and map debates in climate science. What scenarios can we envisage, and what are the implications of each? ☜FFB597
▲
Issue-centric »
Issue-centric
Issue-centric☜A group forms to tackle a specific issue, and then brings in one or more technological tools as deemed appropriate ☜59C6EF
▲
Go broad and deep on an issue »
Go broad and deep on an issue
Go broad and deep on an issue☜An issue defined reasonably broadly could attract many interested stakeholders, simulating a non-trivial user groupwith divergent perspectives☜98CE71
▲
What will be the process of agreeing which tools are used? »
What will be the process of agreeing which tools are used?
What will be the process of agreeing which tools are used?☜☜FFB597
▲
Decided in close discussion between appointed experts and tool groups »
Decided in close discussion between appointed experts and tool groups
Decided in close discussion between appointed experts and tool groups☜☜59C6EF
■
Closes off emergent requirements as new stakeholders come on board
Closes off emergent requirements as new stakeholders come on board☜If the decisions are locked down, then if new people join the group, their needs might not be met ☜EF597B
Heading
Summary
Click the button to enter task scheduling information
Open
Details
Enter task details
Message text
Select assignee(s)
Due date (click calendar)
RadDatePicker
RadDatePicker
Open the calendar popup.
Calendar
Title and navigation
Title and navigation
<<
<
November 2024
>
<<
November 2024
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
44
27
28
29
30
31
1
2
45
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
46
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
47
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
48
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
49
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Reminder
No reminder
1 day before due
2 days before due
3 days before due
1 week before due
Ready to post
Copy to text
Enter
Cancel
Task assignment(s) have been emailed and cannot now be altered
Lock
Cancel
Save
Comment graphing options
Choose comments:
Comment only
Whole thread
All comments
Choose location:
To a new map
To this map
New map options
Select map ontology
Options
Standard (default) ontology
College debate ontology
Hypothesis ontology
Influence diagram ontology
Story ontology
Graph to private map
Cancel
Proceed
+Commentaar (
0
)
- Commentaar
Voeg commentaar toe
Newest first
Oldest first
Show threads
+Citaten (
0
)
- Citaten
Voeg citaat toe
List by:
Citerank
Map
+About
- About
Gemaakt door:
Simon Buckingham Shum
NodeID:
#6487
Node type:
OpposingArgument
Gemaakt op (GMT):
9/15/2008 9:46:00 AM
Laatste bewerking (GMT):
9/15/2008 9:46:00 AM
Show other editors
Inkomende kruisrelatie
0
Uitgaande kruisrelatie
0
Gemiddelde waardering:
0
by
0
gebruikers
x
Select file to upload