Link[1]
Citerend uit: Recep Tayyip Erdogan
Geciteerd door: David Price 9:20 PM 16 April 2010 GMT
Citerank: (32) 53272No substantive agreement in Copenhagen2600BFFF, 57524Turkey is unlikely to support sanctions unless IAEA is unequivocal959C6EF, 57526Iran has assured Turkey that is has no investment in nuclear arms109FDEF6, 57527Turkey believes the process should be resolved through diplomacy109FDEF6, 57529Turkey/Iran had good relations under Kasri Sirin agreement since 1639109FDEF6, 57534Turkey simply seeking good relations with all its neighbors959C6EF, 57536Glut of small arms and light weapons from Russia, Europe and US8FFB597, 57538Engagement now does not preclude holding Bashir to account laterThis is where realism sometimes sets in: Bsashir is the one in charge. He is the man running Sudan. And the one to talk to consolidate the agreements they have made and to bring about peace. But that does not exclude that eventually he will be held to account.13EF597B, 57540There are no statutes of limitation for crimes of this kindThose who have committed these kinds of crimes are not going to have any immunity. There are no statutes of limitation. If not today or tomorrow, eventually they will be held to account.1198CE71, 57541Civil society asserting itself is fundamental to political reform109FDEF6, 96000Glut of small arms and light weapons from Russia, Europe and US8FFB597, 96002Civil society asserting itself is fundamental to political reform109FDEF6, 96377Turkey simply seeking good relations with all its neighbors959C6EF, 96378Turkey is unlikely to support sanctions unless IAEA is unequivocal959C6EF, 96475No substantive agreement in Copenhagen2600BFFF, 96684Iran has assured Turkey that is has no investment in nuclear arms109FDEF6, 96685Turkey believes the process should be resolved through diplomacy109FDEF6, 96686IAEA hasn't definitively said Iranian facility is for nuclear arms109FDEF6, 96687Turkey/Iran had good relations under Kasri Sirin agreement since 1639109FDEF6, 96884Engagement now does not preclude holding Bashir to account laterThis is where realism sometimes sets in: Bsashir is the one in charge. He is the man running Sudan. And the one to talk to consolidate the agreements they have made and to bring about peace. But that does not exclude that eventually he will be held to account.13EF597B, 97095There are no statutes of limitation for crimes of this kindThose who have committed these kinds of crimes are not going to have any immunity. There are no statutes of limitation. If not today or tomorrow, eventually they will be held to account.1198CE71, 147935Turkey simply seeking good relations with all its neighbors959C6EF, 147936Turkey is unlikely to support sanctions unless IAEA is unequivocal959C6EF, 148033No substantive agreement in Copenhagen2600BFFF, 148242Iran has assured Turkey that is has no investment in nuclear arms109FDEF6, 148243Turkey believes the process should be resolved through diplomacy109FDEF6, 148244IAEA hasn't definitively said Iranian facility is for nuclear arms109FDEF6, 148245Turkey/Iran had good relations under Kasri Sirin agreement since 1639109FDEF6, 148443Engagement now does not preclude holding Bashir to account laterThis is where realism sometimes sets in: Bsashir is the one in charge. He is the man running Sudan. And the one to talk to consolidate the agreements they have made and to bring about peace. But that does not exclude that eventually he will be held to account.13EF597B, 148654There are no statutes of limitation for crimes of this kindThose who have committed these kinds of crimes are not going to have any immunity. There are no statutes of limitation. If not today or tomorrow, eventually they will be held to account.1198CE71, 150203Glut of small arms and light weapons from Russia, Europe and US8FFB597, 150205Civil society asserting itself is fundamental to political reform109FDEF6 URL:
|
| Fragment- ERDOGAN (through translator): The IAEA has not definitively come out to say that the facility is for nuclear arms. What is being said is that Iran is not acting transparently and that there is a probability, a possibility that such work could be ongoing. But there is no definitive determination there.
So under those circumstances, if Iran is saying that they are establishing their facilities for civilian use, and they showed their facilities to the officials from the IAEA, that being the case, for us to say, "No, they are doing this for a nuclear arms facility," is, in my opinion, not proper.
|