Human valuation is a shifting phenomenon, so expecting any system that quantifies it to convert fallibility into perfection is unreasonable. Markets are social learning mechanisms -- as well as status systems. Since learning is emotional as well as intellectual, excess exuberance is expected, but then; how fast can it be corrected?
The recent size of exuberance overshoots suggests that the system is seriously flawed, lacking feedback that tells us we're too optimistic.
This seems particularly foolish when the system lacks incentive or means to anticipate whether we are collectively able to physically do what we are projecting that we can do, or what the consequences will be.
And if transaction-based valuations become so abstract from any physical reality that people are only trading promises of future income in various risk categories, is it blowing a bubble based only on itself -- assuming that trading volume itself is an indicator of value?