Clancey's ideas on new category creation are ill-founded
Clancey's ideas about the creation of new categories are too radical and are not supported by the research. Some relatively constant categories are necessary and their existence has been demonstrated in animals.
PAGE NAVIGATOR(Help)
-
Artificial Intelligence »Artificial Intelligence
Can computers think? [1] »Can computers think? [1]
Yes: physical symbol systems can think [3] »Yes: physical symbol systems can think [3]
The Representationalist Assumption »The Representationalist Assumption
The representational tradition is flawed »The representational tradition is flawed
The Situated Action Paradigm »The Situated Action Paradigm
The mechanisms situated action describes are symbol systems »The mechanisms situated action describes are symbol systems
More to human thought than symbol maniputation »More to human thought than symbol maniputation
Clancey's account of symbols is too limited »Clancey's account of symbols is too limited
Clancey's ideas on new category creation are ill-founded
+Commentaar (0)
+Citaten (0)
+About