Views
Graph
Explorer
Focus
Down
Load 1 level
Load 2 levels
Load 3 levels
Load 4 levels
Load all levels
All
Dagre
Focus
Down
Load 1 level
Load 2 levels
Load 3 levels
Load 4 level
Load all levels
All
Tree
SpaceTree
Focus
Expanding
Load 1 level
Load 2 levels
Load 3 levels
Down
All
Down
Radial
Focus
Expanding
Load 1 level
Load 2 levels
Load 3 levels
Down
All
Down
Box
Focus
Expanding
Down
Up
All
Down
Page ✓
Article
Outline
Document
Down
All
Canvas
Time
Timeline
Calendar
Request email digest
Past 24 hours
Past 2 days
Past 3 days
Past week
Add
Add page
Add comment
Add citation
Edit
Edit page
Delete page
Share
Link
Bookmark
Embed
Social media
Login
Member login
Register now for a free account
🔎
Should everybody drop everything to work on global warming?
Question
1
#437275
Should we work only on global warming, because, in a sense, this has already happened: two degrees should really be one degree?
[1]
PAGE NAVIGATOR
(Help)
-
The Global 21st Century »
The Global 21st Century
The Global 21st Century☜How do we navigate the Global 21st Century?☜F1CEB7
▲
Questions »
Questions
Questions☜ Related questions.☜EFB0B0
■
Should everybody drop everything to work on global warming?
Should everybody drop everything to work on global warming?☜☜D5CB99
●
What does the question mean? »
What does the question mean?
What does the question mean?☜Whos everybody? Whats everything?☜D5CB99
●
No: There are other Civiization Ending Risks & Challenges »
No: There are other Civiization Ending Risks & Challenges
No: There are other Civiization Ending Risks & Challenges☜Biodiversity loss, nuclear weapons, runaway AI ...☜59C6EF
●
Yes: We have to move faster, everybody has to be onboard. »
Yes: We have to move faster, everybody has to be onboard.
Yes: We have to move faster, everybody has to be onboard.☜☜59C6EF
Heading
Summary
Click the button to enter task scheduling information
Open
Details
Enter task details
Message text
Select assignee(s)
Due date (click calendar)
RadDatePicker
RadDatePicker
Open the calendar popup.
Calendar
Title and navigation
Title and navigation
<<
<
November 2024
>
<<
November 2024
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
44
27
28
29
30
31
1
2
45
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
46
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
47
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
48
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
49
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Reminder
No reminder
1 day before due
2 days before due
3 days before due
1 week before due
Ready to post
Copy to text
Enter
Cancel
Task assignment(s) have been emailed and cannot now be altered
Lock
Cancel
Save
Comment graphing options
Choose comments:
Comment only
Whole thread
All comments
Choose location:
To a new map
To this map
New map options
Select map ontology
Options
Standard (default) ontology
College debate ontology
Hypothesis ontology
Influence diagram ontology
Story ontology
Graph to private map
Cancel
Proceed
+Commentaar (
0
)
- Commentaar
Voeg commentaar toe
Newest first
Oldest first
Show threads
+Citaten (
1
)
- Citaten
Voeg citaat toe
List by:
Citerank
Map
Link
[1]
The Brutal Logic of Climate Change
Citerend uit:
David Roberts
Publication date:
6 December 2011
Publication info:
Grist
Geciteerd door:
Paul P.
2:04 PM 12 July 2016 GMT
URL:
http://grist.org/climate-change/2011-12-05-the-brutal-logic-of-climate-change/
Fragment-
As you can see, the 2 degrees C “guardrail” that separated acceptable from dangerous in 2001 is, in 2009, squarely inside several red zones. Today, the exact same social and political considerations that settled on 2 degrees C as the threshold of safety by all rights ought to settle on 1 degree C [1.8 degrees F]. After all, we now know 2 degrees C is extremely dangerous.
x
Select file to upload