|
Product labelling How1 #370052
| Clear labelling which describes the content of food and drink products is important because it helps consumers to make informed choices. It may also be an important means of encouraging manufacturers and retailers to reformulate processed foods high in saturated fats, salt and added sugars. Evidence shows that simple traffic light labelling consistently works better than more complex schemes . Policy goals
Ensure the integrated front-of-pack labelling system developed by the Food Standards Agency is rapidly implemented. Ensure labelling regulations in England are not adversely influenced by EU regulation. To achieve this, the evidence suggests that the following are among the measures that should be considered. Recommended actions - Establish the single, integrated, front-of-pack traffic light colour-coded system developed by the Food Standards Agency as the national standard for food and drink products sold in England. This includes the simple, traffic light, colour-coding visual icon and text which indicates whether food or drink contains a 'high', 'medium' or 'low' level of salt, fat or sugar. It also includes text to indicate the product's percentage contribution to the guideline daily amount (GDA) from each category.
- Consider using legislation to ensure universal implementation of the front-of-pack traffic light labelling system developed by the Food Standards Agency.
- Develop and implement nutritional labelling for use on shelves or packaging for bread, cakes, meat and dairy products displayed in a loose or unwrapped state or packed on the premises. The labelling should be consistent with the traffic light labelling system developed by the Food Standards Agency.
- Ensure food and drink labelling is consistent in format and content. In particular, it should refer to salt (as opposed to sodium), the content per 100 gand use kcals as the measure of energy.
- Continue to support the Department of Health in providing clear information about healthy eating.
- Ensure the UK continues to set the standard of best practice by pursuing exemption from potentially less effective EU food labelling regulations when appropriate.
|
+Citaten (1) - CitatenVoeg citaat toeList by: CiterankMapLink[1] Consumer testing of the acceptability and effectiveness of front-of-pack food labelling systems for the Australian grocery market.
Citerend uit: B. Kelly, C. Hughes, K. Chapman, J. C. Louie, H. Dixon - J. Crawford, L. King, M. Daube, T. Slevin Publication info: 2009 June, Health Promotion International, 2009 Jun;24(2):120-9. doi: 10.1093/heapro/dap012 Geciteerd door: David Price 4:29 PM 26 December 2014 GMT Citerank: (2) 352380Improve food labellingMajor food manufacturers and supermarkets should agree in the next year a unified system of traffic light food labelling (to be based on percentage of calories for men, women, children and adolescents) and visible calorie indicators for restaurants, especially fast food outlets.565CA4D9, 399572Improve food labellingMajor food manufacturers and supermarkets should agree in the next year a unified system of traffic light food labelling (to be based on percentage of calories for men, women, children and adolescents) and visible calorie indicators for restaurants, especially fast food outlets.565CA4D9 URL: | Fragment- The placement of nutrition information on the front of food packages has been proposed as a method of providing simplified and visible nutrition information. This study aimed to determine the most acceptable and effective front-of-pack food labelling system for Australian consumers. Consumers' preferences and ability to compare the healthiness of mock food products were assessed for different front-of-pack labelling systems. Four systems were tested, including two variations of the Percentage Daily Intake system (Monochrome %DI and Colour-Coded %DI), which displays the proportion of daily nutrient contribution that a serve of food provides; and two variations of the Traffic Light (TL) system (Traffic Light and Traffic Light + Overall Rating), which uses colour-coding to indicate nutrient levels. Intercept surveys with 790 consumers were conducted, where each participant was exposed to a single labelling system for performance testing. Participants indicated strong support for the inclusion of nutrient information on total fat, saturated fat, sugar and sodium on the front of packages, and a consistent labelling format across all products. Using the TL system, participants were five times more likely to identify healthier foods compared with the Monochrome %DI system [odds ratio (OR) = 5.18; p < 0.001], and three times more likely compared with the Colour-Coded %DI system (OR = 3.01; p < 0.05). Consumers supported the introduction of consistent front-of-pack food labelling. The TL system was the most effective in assisting consumers to identify healthier foods. Mandatory TL labelling regulations are recommended to assist consumers in making healthy food choices. |
|
|