Details view: Disagree

Views
Add
Edit
- Edit page
- Delete page
Share
Login
- Member login
- Register now for a free account
🔎

Disagree Stelling1 #306180

PAGE NAVIGATOR(Help)

Crowdsourcing and multi-disciplinary risk assessment? »Crowdsourcing and multi-disciplinary risk assessment?Crowdsourcing and multi-disciplinary risk assessment?☜Many risk researchers see a need to improve the theory and practice of risk management, and policy organisations want alternatives to traditional practices like consulting expert opinion and resolving issues through public policy and debate. Can a suitable methodology be found to crowdsource, i.e. harness the power of a large and diverse group of people using the power of the internet, risk assessments? What are the potential upsides; where do the pitfalls appear and can these be avoided?☜F1CEB7

▲

Against the Proposition »Against the PropositionAgainst the Proposition☜Arguments against the proposition that crowdsourcing can facilitate multi-disciplinary risk assessment. ☜59C6EF

▲

The results could be manipulated or gamed for dubious purposes »The results could be manipulated or gamed for dubious purposesThe results could be manipulated or gamed for dubious purposes☜Does this mean crowdsourcing is inherently unsuited to framing a balanced risk assessment? Might it not in fact be that an open debate exposes actors operating for dubious purposes? Expert panels may have just as much potential to be manipulated - their composition might have been decided on political grounds for example.☜98CE71

■

DisagreeDisagree☜☜59C6EF

●

An Expert panel is just as likely to be manipulated »An Expert panel is just as likely to be manipulatedAn Expert panel is just as likely to be manipulated☜An Expert panel is just as likely to be manipulated, particularly as there would be fewer participants. The crowd are more difficult to manipulate, as there are more of them to influence.☜98CE71

●

Manipulation could be mitigated by governance »Manipulation could be mitigated by governanceManipulation could be mitigated by governance☜Good governance of a debate would promote the quality of the arguments rather than the noise or profile of the arguments.☜98CE71

Heading

Summary

Click the button to enter task scheduling information

Details

Enter task details

Message text

Select assignee(s)

Due date (click calendar)

RadDatePicker

Open the calendar popup.

Calendar

Title and navigation
Title and navigation
<<	<	November 2024	>	<<

November 2024
	S	M	T	W	T	F	S
44	27	28	29	30	31	1	2
45	3	4	5	6	7	8	9
46	10	11	12	13	14	15	16
47	17	18	19	20	21	22	23
48	24	25	26	27	28	29	30
49	1	2	3	4	5	6	7

Reminder

Ready to post Copy to text

Task assignment(s) have been emailed and cannot now be altered

Lock

Comment graphing options

Choose comments:Comment onlyWhole threadAll comments

Choose location:To a new mapTo this map

New map options

Select map ontology Graph to private map

+Commentaar (0)

- CommentaarVoeg commentaar toeNewest firstOldest firstShow threads

+Citaten (0)

- CitatenVoeg citaat toeList by: CiterankMap

+About

- About

Gemaakt door: Torran Elson
NodeID: #306180
Node type: Position
Gemaakt op (GMT): 12/11/2013 4:58:00 PM
Laatste bewerking (GMT): 12/11/2013 4:58:00 PM
Show other editors
Inkomende kruisrelatie 0
Uitgaande kruisrelatie 0
Gemiddelde waardering: 1 by 1 gebruikers

x Select file to upload