Anthony misrepresents the argument
Fodor and Pylyshyn don't argue for a classical architecture solely on the basis of systematicity. They acknowledge that a theory of cognition must account for other phenomena as well.
In fact, they discuss productivity and inferential coherence as additional phenomena that a theory of cognition must explain.

Brian McLoughlin,1993a.
Immediately related elementsHow this works
-
Artificial Intelligence »Artificial Intelligence
▲
Can computers think? [1] »Can computers think? [1]
▲
Yes: connectionist networks can think [5a] »Yes: connectionist networks can think [5a]
▲
The Connectionist Dilemma »The Connectionist Dilemma
▲
Systematicity not enough to argue for classicism »Systematicity not enough to argue for classicism
■
Anthony misrepresents the argument
+Komentarai (0)
+Citavimą (0)
+About