The Chinese Room argument is circular
To show that syntactic symbol manipulations can never give the man in the room an understanding of Chinese, Searle assumes the man understands no Chinese, which itself assumes that performing syntactic symbol manipulations doesn't yield semantics.


Dale Jacquette, 1990.
Immediately related elementsHow this works
-
Artificial Intelligence »Artificial Intelligence
▲
Can computers think? [1] »Can computers think? [1]
▲
Yes: physical symbol systems can think [3] »Yes: physical symbol systems can think [3]
▲
The Chinese Room Argument [4] »The Chinese Room Argument [4]
■
The Chinese Room argument is circular
+Komentarai (0)
+Citavimą (0)
+About