Close parallelism between debate and scientific discourse concepts
In scientific discourse, we have "problems", "claims", "agreements", "disagreements", "arguments", "rebuttals", etc. These notions are very similar to the concepts that govern debates in general (and in the IBIS-Debategraph sense in particular).
Immediately related elementsHow this works
-
DebateGraph Community »DebateGraph Community
▲
Development Ideas »Development Ideas
▲
New features? »New features?
▲
Importing / Exporting »Importing / Exporting
▲
Software / formats that you would like to export to / import from? »Software / formats that you would like to export to / import from?
▲
Use RDF for import/export »Use RDF for import/export
▲
What ontologies / vocabularies are available for argumentation models? »What ontologies / vocabularies are available for argumentation models?
▲
DERI's argumentation model  »DERI's argumentation model
▲
DERI's ontologies that could be used for argumentation? »DERI's ontologies that could be used for argumentation?
▲
The SWAN ontology has concepts about scientific discourse (neurology) »The SWAN ontology has concepts about scientific discourse (neurology)
■
Close parallelism between debate and scientific discourse concepts
●
Evidence // Argument »Evidence // Argument
●
Hypothesis // Position »Hypothesis // Position
+Komentarai (0)
+Citavimą (0)
+About