Common misperception that addressing AGW is a cost, not an investment.
Large sums are needed to mobilise against climate change. These are often viewed as prohibitive capital costs, rather than seeing them for what they are - sensible investments in energy security, ecological security, job creation, and a valuable counter to Peak Oil.
Immediately related elementsHow this works
-
The Global Financial Crisis »The Global Financial Crisis
▲
Potential consequences of the financial crisis? »Potential consequences of the financial crisis?
▲
Implications of financial crisis for climate change? »Implications of financial crisis for climate change?
▲
Financial crisis makes strong UN climate change deal less likely »Financial crisis makes strong UN climate change deal less likely
■
Common misperception that addressing AGW is a cost, not an investment.
+Komentarai (0)
+Citavimą (0)
+About