ISEPP Petition on DSM-5
"This places professionals in an ethical double bind. In order to work with people who choose to use health insurance benefits, the professional must provide a DSM diagnosis; a diagnosis known to be invalid and potentially harmful. If, on the other hand, the professional refuses to diagnose in order to avoid the harm, and precluding insurance coverage, then the consumer may not be able to afford badly desired help."

ISEPP Calling for Organizations to Join in Petition / February, 2017

"In recognition of this ethical dilemma, ISEPP has drafted an open letter to four principal professional organizations in the United States, publicizing this concern and asking for ethical guidance. The draft of this letter is included below. ISEPP is soliciting other groups to join us in this letter."

*

Direct links to this page:

Outline View: dgraph.org/ISEPPpov

Page View (phones): dgraph.org/ISEPPppv

Or use Views menu.

Immediately related elementsHow this works
-
ISPS-US Moving Forward Map »ISPS-US Moving Forward Map
▲
Moving Forward »Moving Forward
▲
How can we move forward? »How can we move forward?
▲
Use the Moving Forward Matrix »Use the Moving Forward Matrix
▲
Pursue Strategic Procedures »Pursue Strategic Procedures
▲
Promote Positive Change »Promote Positive Change
■
ISEPP Petition on DSM-5
◄
Allen Frances condemns DSM-5. 2013. »Allen Frances condemns DSM-5. 2013.
+Komentarai (0)
+Citavimą (0)
+About