Military strike on Iran would not be self-defence
A military strike on Iran would not meet the legal definition of self-defence.
Immediately related elementsHow this works
-
Responding to Iran's nuclear ambitions »Responding to Iran's nuclear ambitions
How should the international community respond? »How should the international community respond?
Military strike on Iranian nuclear facilities »Military strike on Iranian nuclear facilities
Legal bases for use of force under international law? »Legal bases for use of force under international law?
Self-defence »Self-defence
Would a military strike meet definition of self-defence? »Would a military strike meet definition of self-defence?
Military strike on Iran would not be self-defence
It would be pre-emptive action, not self-defence »It would be pre-emptive action, not self-defence
Use of force in self-defence requires actual or imminent attack »Use of force in self-defence requires actual or imminent attack
+Komentarai (0)
+Citavimą (0)
+About