Views
Graph
Explorer
Focus
Down
Load 1 level
Load 2 levels
Load 3 levels
Load 4 levels
Load all levels
All
Dagre
Focus
Down
Load 1 level
Load 2 levels
Load 3 levels
Load 4 level
Load all levels
All
Tree
SpaceTree
Focus
Expanding
Load 1 level
Load 2 levels
Load 3 levels
Down
All
Down
Radial
Focus
Expanding
Load 1 level
Load 2 levels
Load 3 levels
Down
All
Down
Box
Focus
Expanding
Down
Up
All
Down
Page ✓
Article
Outline
Document
Down
All
Canvas
Time
Timeline
Calendar
Request email digest
Past 24 hours
Past 2 days
Past 3 days
Past week
Add
Add page
Add comment
Add citation
Edit
Edit page
Delete page
Share
Link
Bookmark
Embed
Social media
Login
Member login
Register now for a free account
🔎
Joseph F. Rychlak
Protagonistas
1
#2771
Arguments advanced by Joseph F. Rychlak.
Immediately related elements
How this works
-
Artificial Intelligence »
Artificial Intelligence
Artificial Intelligence☜A collaboratively editable version of Robert Horns brilliant and pioneering debate map Can Computers Think?—exploring 50 years of philosophical argument about the possibility of computer thought.☜F1CEB7
▲
Protagonists »
Protagonists
Protagonists☜The contributions of over 300 protagonists can be explored via a surname search, or using the growing list developing here.☜D3B8AB
■
Joseph F. Rychlak
Joseph F. Rychlak☜Arguments advanced by Joseph F. Rychlak.☜D3B8AB
►
Computers can't do otherwise »
Computers can't do otherwise
Computers can't do otherwise☜An agents actions are free if and only if the agent can do otherwise than peform them. The agent is free only if it can change its goals—but only dialectical reasoning allows an agent to change its goals, and machines are not capable of this.☜FFFACD
►
Recursive interpretation gives wrong picture »
Recursive interpretation gives wrong picture
Recursive interpretation gives wrong picture☜Recursive loops dont allow the background of the figure-ground structure to have independent properties; but a key property of Gestalt images is that their backgrounds are symbols in the own right. Hence, Gestalts are not recursively interpretable.☜FFFACD
►
Learning is a process of interpretation »
Learning is a process of interpretation
Learning is a process of interpretation☜A mind, reasoning dialectically and predicationally, learns by interpreting what it perceives in terms of the meaning of what it perceives; as computers dont work with meanings, interpretation and the relevant kind of learning is impossible.☜FFFACD
►
Symbol systems can't think dialectically »
Symbol systems can't think dialectically
Symbol systems can't think dialectically☜Computers cant reason dialectically because they cant synthesize opposing meanings into new meaning. All they can do is just shuffle symbols that are given meaning by a programmer.☜FFFACD
►
Symbol systems can't exhibit agency »
Symbol systems can't exhibit agency
Symbol systems can't exhibit agency☜Symbol processors can never have agency. Agency requries teleology, dialectical reasoning, and free will. Computers lack these traits, because they dont understand meanings, the relations between them, and their relation to the world. ☜FFFACD
►
Negative feedback can't explain teleology »
Negative feedback can't explain teleology
Negative feedback can't explain teleology☜Goal-directedness and feedback activity cant explain agency. An explanation of agency must address the formation of goals and beliefs, and the ability to change those goals and beliefs. Current machines only seek the goals theyre programmed to.☜FFFACD
►
Agency is due predication and choice »
Agency is due predication and choice
Agency is due predication and choice☜Even with delaying mechanisms, automatic decision-making processes still cant choose their own goals or reflect on the meaning of alternatives. The standards they use to choose between alternatives arent the result of their own status as agents.☜FFFACD
►
Can't process symbols predicationally or oppositionally »
Can't process symbols predicationally or oppositionally
Can't process symbols predicationally or oppositionally☜Chinese Room lacks understanding as it cant operate on the meanings of symbols—in particular it cant narrow down the meaning of an already meaningful symbol (predication), nor can it reason from whats the case to whats not the case (opposition).☜FFFACD
►
The Anthropomorphizing Objection »
The Anthropomorphizing Objection
The Anthropomorphizing Objection☜Our tendency to anthropomorphize machines should caution us against calling them intelligent. Conversing and passing the Turing test isnt enough to establish intelligent thought. Introspection is also necessary and the test doesnt reveal it.☜FFFACD
Heading
Summary
Click the button to enter task scheduling information
Open
Details
Enter task details
Message text
Select assignee(s)
Due date (click calendar)
RadDatePicker
RadDatePicker
Open the calendar popup.
Calendar
Title and navigation
Title and navigation
<<
<
November 2024
>
<<
November 2024
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
44
27
28
29
30
31
1
2
45
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
46
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
47
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
48
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
49
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Reminder
No reminder
1 day before due
2 days before due
3 days before due
1 week before due
Ready to post
Copy to text
Enter
Cancel
Task assignment(s) have been emailed and cannot now be altered
Lock
Cancel
Save
Comment graphing options
Choose comments:
Comment only
Whole thread
All comments
Choose location:
To a new map
To this map
New map options
Select map ontology
Options
Standard (default) ontology
College debate ontology
Hypothesis ontology
Influence diagram ontology
Story ontology
Graph to private map
Cancel
Proceed
+Komentarai (
0
)
- Komentarai
Komentuoti
Newest first
Oldest first
Show threads
+Citavimą (
0
)
- Citavimą
Pridėti citatą
List by:
Citerank
Map
+About
- About
Redagavo:
David Price
NodeID:
#2771
Node type:
Protagonist
Įvedimo data (GMT):
7/20/2007 6:04:00 PM
Paskutinės redakcijos data (GMT laikas):
7/20/2007 6:04:00 PM
Show other editors
Įeinančios sąsajos:
0
Išeinančios sąsajos:
9
Vidutinis vertinimas:
0
by
0
vartotojai
x
Select file to upload