No: passing the Test is not decisive
Even if a computer were to pass the Turing test, this would not justify the conclusion that it was thinking intelligently.
Ned Block, 1981.


Note: Because the issue of passing the Turing Test is closely tied with the issue of what can be inferred from external behaviour, this region of the map contains arguments that are similar to those in the "Is the test, behaviorally or operationally construed, a legitimate intelligence test?" arguments on this map.
Immediately related elementsHow this works
-
Artificial Intelligence »Artificial Intelligence
▲
Can the Turing Test determine this? [2]  »Can the Turing Test determine this? [2] 
■
No: passing the Test is not decisive
●
A zombie or unconscious machine could pass the test »A zombie or unconscious machine could pass the test
●
Human judges may be fooled too easily »Human judges may be fooled too easily
●
Merely syntactic machines could pass the test »Merely syntactic machines could pass the test
●
Nonstandard human controls can mislead a judge »Nonstandard human controls can mislead a judge
●
The Anthropomorphizing Objection »The Anthropomorphizing Objection
●
The Chinese Room passes the test »The Chinese Room passes the test
●
The Turing test is too narrow »The Turing test is too narrow
●
Turing Test underdetermines creation of humanlike robots »Turing Test underdetermines creation of humanlike robots
◄
Ned Block »Ned Block
◄
Vulnerable to counter-examples »Vulnerable to counter-examples
◄
Operational interpretation is too rigid »Operational interpretation is too rigid
+Komentarai (0)
+Citavimą (0)
+About