SME too rigid in its distinctions
In order for its analogical mapings to work, SME assumes a rigid distinction between objects, attributes, and relations. But it is unclear whether humans make such a rigid distinction.
For example, we sometimes conceptualise wealth as an object that flows between people, but at other times conceptualise wealth as an attribute that changes with each transaction we make.

David Chalmers, Robert French, Douglas Hofstadter, 1995.
Immediately related elementsHow this works
-
Artificial Intelligence »Artificial Intelligence
▲
Can computers think? [1] »Can computers think? [1]
▲
No: computers can't draw analogies »No: computers can't draw analogies
▲
Computers have understood analogy »Computers have understood analogy
▲
SME »SME
■
SME too rigid in its distinctions
◄
David Chalmers »David Chalmers
◄
Douglas Hofstadter »Douglas Hofstadter
+Komentarai (0)
+Citavimą (0)
+About