|
Harms: There are still weapons of mass destruction Stock Issue1 #154124 weapons of mass destruction goes beyond nuclear missiles, it also means the people and weapons they carry that want to fight americans, they themselves are the W.M.D, Iran and Pakistan want to invade Afganistan with their neuclerized technology, they wont when we are there cause we will fight back. | |
+Citavimą (3) - CitavimąPridėti citatąList by: CiterankMapLink[1] IRAN AND PAKISTAN if we leave
Cituoja: CAPS Cituojamas: Travis Slotemaker 0:40 AM 9 May 2012 GMT Citerank: (4) 154124Harms: There are still weapons of mass destructionweapons of mass destruction goes beyond nuclear missiles, it also means the people and weapons they carry that want to fight americans, they themselves are the W.M.D, Iran and Pakistan want to invade Afganistan with their neuclerized technology, they wont when we are there cause we will fight back.4400FC7E, 154124Harms: There are still weapons of mass destructionweapons of mass destruction goes beyond nuclear missiles, it also means the people and weapons they carry that want to fight americans, they themselves are the W.M.D, Iran and Pakistan want to invade Afganistan with their neuclerized technology, they wont when we are there cause we will fight back.4400FC7E, 154125Inherency: Leaving will just enable them to fight back.4400FC7E, 154126Solvency: Stay involved and finish them till there is no rebels4400FC7E URL:
| Ištrauka - Afghanistan does not have the advantage of nuclear deterrence or a strong army force to defeat any aggressive attacks from its neighbors, especially Iran and Pakistan both of which are problematic and have ambiguous interests in Afghanistan. Nuclearized Iran and its home grown form of radicalization based on anti-western sentiments, can pose a threat for the future of Afghanistan- U.S. strategic partnership. Iran wants U.S. to leave Afghanistan; however Afghanistan is more inclined to maintain close relations with the west, especially the U.S. since it would shield Afghanistan from any regional security threats. To counter this, Afghanistan must ensure and convince Iran that the Afghanistan-U.S. strategic partnership will not affect Iran- Afghanistan brotherhood relations.8 Nuclear Pakistan is also going through a long – drawn national crisis, in other words, becoming a “collapse state” while extremism becomes an ever growing concern. It is clear that an insecure and unstable Pakistan will create havoc in Afghanistan. Moreover, Pakistan has always tried to project its role to play as a bridge for the U.S.-Afghanistan relations and show the U.S. that a strategic partnership with Pakistan is enough to facilitate the U.S. in meeting its interests in the region. Hence, this strategic partnership will be deemed a threat for both Pakistan and Iran.9 |
Link[2] IRAN AND PAKISTAN if we leave
Cituoja: CAPS Cituojamas: Travis Slotemaker 0:40 AM 9 May 2012 GMT Citerank: (4) 154124Harms: There are still weapons of mass destructionweapons of mass destruction goes beyond nuclear missiles, it also means the people and weapons they carry that want to fight americans, they themselves are the W.M.D, Iran and Pakistan want to invade Afganistan with their neuclerized technology, they wont when we are there cause we will fight back.4400FC7E, 154124Harms: There are still weapons of mass destructionweapons of mass destruction goes beyond nuclear missiles, it also means the people and weapons they carry that want to fight americans, they themselves are the W.M.D, Iran and Pakistan want to invade Afganistan with their neuclerized technology, they wont when we are there cause we will fight back.4400FC7E, 154125Inherency: Leaving will just enable them to fight back.4400FC7E, 154126Solvency: Stay involved and finish them till there is no rebels4400FC7E URL:
| Ištrauka - Afghanistan does not have the advantage of nuclear deterrence or a strong army force to defeat any aggressive attacks from its neighbors, especially Iran and Pakistan both of which are problematic and have ambiguous interests in Afghanistan. Nuclearized Iran and its home grown form of radicalization based on anti-western sentiments, can pose a threat for the future of Afghanistan- U.S. strategic partnership. Iran wants U.S. to leave Afghanistan; however Afghanistan is more inclined to maintain close relations with the west, especially the U.S. since it would shield Afghanistan from any regional security threats. To counter this, Afghanistan must ensure and convince Iran that the Afghanistan-U.S. strategic partnership will not affect Iran- Afghanistan brotherhood relations.8 Nuclear Pakistan is also going through a long – drawn national crisis, in other words, becoming a “collapse state” while extremism becomes an ever growing concern. It is clear that an insecure and unstable Pakistan will create havoc in Afghanistan. Moreover, Pakistan has always tried to project its role to play as a bridge for the U.S.-Afghanistan relations and show the U.S. that a strategic partnership with Pakistan is enough to facilitate the U.S. in meeting its interests in the region. Hence, this strategic partnership will be deemed a threat for both Pakistan and Iran.9 |
Link[3] IRAN AND PAKISTAN if we leave
Cituoja: CAPS Cituojamas: Travis Slotemaker 0:40 AM 9 May 2012 GMT Citerank: (4) 154124Harms: There are still weapons of mass destructionweapons of mass destruction goes beyond nuclear missiles, it also means the people and weapons they carry that want to fight americans, they themselves are the W.M.D, Iran and Pakistan want to invade Afganistan with their neuclerized technology, they wont when we are there cause we will fight back.4400FC7E, 154124Harms: There are still weapons of mass destructionweapons of mass destruction goes beyond nuclear missiles, it also means the people and weapons they carry that want to fight americans, they themselves are the W.M.D, Iran and Pakistan want to invade Afganistan with their neuclerized technology, they wont when we are there cause we will fight back.4400FC7E, 154125Inherency: Leaving will just enable them to fight back.4400FC7E, 154126Solvency: Stay involved and finish them till there is no rebels4400FC7E URL:
| Ištrauka - Afghanistan does not have the advantage of nuclear deterrence or a strong army force to defeat any aggressive attacks from its neighbors, especially Iran and Pakistan both of which are problematic and have ambiguous interests in Afghanistan. Nuclearized Iran and its home grown form of radicalization based on anti-western sentiments, can pose a threat for the future of Afghanistan- U.S. strategic partnership. Iran wants U.S. to leave Afghanistan; however Afghanistan is more inclined to maintain close relations with the west, especially the U.S. since it would shield Afghanistan from any regional security threats. To counter this, Afghanistan must ensure and convince Iran that the Afghanistan-U.S. strategic partnership will not affect Iran- Afghanistan brotherhood relations.8 Nuclear Pakistan is also going through a long – drawn national crisis, in other words, becoming a “collapse state” while extremism becomes an ever growing concern. It is clear that an insecure and unstable Pakistan will create havoc in Afghanistan. Moreover, Pakistan has always tried to project its role to play as a bridge for the U.S.-Afghanistan relations and show the U.S. that a strategic partnership with Pakistan is enough to facilitate the U.S. in meeting its interests in the region. Hence, this strategic partnership will be deemed a threat for both Pakistan and Iran.9 |
|
|