2. Intermediary Liability

a. No one who simply provides technical Internet services such as providing access, or searching for, or transmission or caching of information, should be liable for content generated by others, which is disseminated using those services, as long as they do not specifically intervene in that content or refuse to obey a court order to remove that content, where they have the capacity to do so (‘mere conduit principle’).

b. Consideration should be given to insulating fully other intermediaries, including those mentioned in the preamble, from liability for content generated by others under the same conditions as in paragraph 2(a). At a minimum, intermediaries should not be required to monitor user-generated content and should not be subject to extrajudicial content takedown rules which fail to provide sufficient protection for freedom of expression (which is the case with many of the ‘notice and takedown’ rules currently being applied).

Immediately related elementsHow this works
-
London Conference on Cyberspace »London Conference on Cyberspace
Thematic debates »Thematic debates
Safe and reliable access »Safe and reliable access
Freedom of expression »Freedom of expression
Joint Declaration on Freedom of Expression and the Internet  »Joint Declaration on Freedom of Expression and the Internet
2. Intermediary Liability
+Komentarai (0)
+Citavimą (0)
+About