The Connection Principle Dilemma
Ned Block argues that the connection principle leads to a dilemma involving access and phenomenal conscisousness (described in the detailed text) which requires the rejection of the principle.
The connection principle leads to a dilemma:

Either, the connection principle is a claim about access consciousness,

In which case, any mental state to be a mental state, must be capable of being reported and reasoned about. In this case, the connection principle is obviously false, because one might have a conscious state but not be able to report it—eg because one's mouth is taped shut.

Or, the connection principle is a claim about phenomenal consciousness,

In which case, any mental state must in principle have an associated feeling. But whether or not every human thought has an accompanying feeling is an unsettled empirical issue for which philosophical reflection is unhelpful.

In either case, the connection principle should be rejected.

Access consciousness: mental states that are available from reporting and reasoning.

Phenomenal consciousness: a mental state that has a certain feeling associated with it.

Ned Block (1990).
Immediately related elementsHow this works
-
Artificial Intelligence »Artificial Intelligence
Can computers think? [1] »Can computers think? [1]
No: computers can't be conscious [6] »No: computers can't be conscious [6]
Consciousness is necessary to thought »Consciousness is necessary to thought
The Connection Principle »The Connection Principle
The Connection Principle Dilemma
Ned Block »Ned Block
+Komentarai (0)
+Citavimą (0)
+About