The sensorimotor system
The subsymbolic paradigm, supplemented by an account of the body’s role in meaningful cognition, overcomes problems that plague classical AI (see detailed text).
In classical symbolic AI, representations are only meaningful by virtue of arbitrary associations with things in the world. Connectionist representations (i.e. activation patterns), by contrast, are intrinsically meaningful by virtue of nonarbitary connections to eyes, ears, limbs, and so forth, which in turn are dependent on the surrounding world.

George Lakoff (1988).

Note: Also, see sidebar "Postulates of experiential realism", on Map 3.
Immediately related elementsHow this works
-
Artificial Intelligence »Artificial Intelligence
Can computers think? [1] »Can computers think? [1]
Yes: connectionist networks can think [5a] »Yes: connectionist networks can think [5a]
The Subsymbolic Paradigm »The Subsymbolic Paradigm
The sensorimotor system
George Lakoff »George Lakoff
+Commentaires (0)
+Citations (0)
+About