Views
Graph
Explorer
Focus
Down
Load 1 level
Load 2 levels
Load 3 levels
Load 4 levels
Load all levels
All
Dagre
Focus
Down
Load 1 level
Load 2 levels
Load 3 levels
Load 4 level
Load all levels
All
Tree
SpaceTree
Focus
Expanding
Load 1 level
Load 2 levels
Load 3 levels
Down
All
Down
Radial
Focus
Expanding
Load 1 level
Load 2 levels
Load 3 levels
Down
All
Down
Box
Focus
Expanding
Down
Up
All
Down
Page ✓
Article
Outline
Document
Down
All
Canvas
Time
Timeline
Calendar
Request email digest
Past 24 hours
Past 2 days
Past 3 days
Past week
Add
Add page
Add comment
Add citation
Edit
Edit page
Delete page
Share
Link
Bookmark
Embed
Social media
Login
Member login
Register now for a free account
🔎
The debate proper
Question
1
#93112
Having considered the preliminary matters identified under the sibling to this node titled 'Threshold Issues', this is where the main body of the debate map is to be developed.
Immediately related elements
How this works
-
Framing the technology debate »
Framing the technology debate
Framing the technology debate☜This map aims to develop a conceptual framework for the debate about the impact of emerging technologies on prospects for democracy and the open society. It will be part of an interrelated cluster of debates on this subject.☜F1CEB7
■
The debate proper
The debate proper☜Having considered the preliminary matters identified under the sibling to this node titled Threshold Issues, this is where the main body of the debate map is to be developed.☜FFB597
●
The issue for autocracies »
The issue for autocracies
The issue for autocracies☜In autocratic states, will the advent of new technologies facilitate or retard efforts to establish democratic elections, the rule of law and freedom of expression?☜FFB597
●
The issue for democracies »
The issue for democracies
The issue for democracies☜Will new technologies improve or detract from the quality of debate and governance in democracies? Will they help safeguard the citizens of such states from challenges to basic rights emanating from state and non-state actors?☜FFB597
Heading
Summary
Click the button to enter task scheduling information
Open
Details
Enter task details
Message text
Select assignee(s)
Due date (click calendar)
RadDatePicker
RadDatePicker
Open the calendar popup.
Calendar
Title and navigation
Title and navigation
<<
<
November 2024
>
<<
November 2024
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
44
27
28
29
30
31
1
2
45
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
46
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
47
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
48
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
49
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Reminder
No reminder
1 day before due
2 days before due
3 days before due
1 week before due
Ready to post
Copy to text
Enter
Cancel
Task assignment(s) have been emailed and cannot now be altered
Lock
Cancel
Save
Comment graphing options
Choose comments:
Comment only
Whole thread
All comments
Choose location:
To a new map
To this map
New map options
Select map ontology
Options
Standard (default) ontology
College debate ontology
Hypothesis ontology
Influence diagram ontology
Story ontology
Graph to private map
Cancel
Proceed
+Commentaires (
0
)
- Commentaires
Ajouter un commentaire
Newest first
Oldest first
Show threads
+Citations (
1
)
- Citations
Ajouter une citation
List by:
Citerank
Map
Link
[1]
En citant:
Kim Zetter
Cité par:
(Del)Veronica Strkalj
10:31 PM 4 March 2011 GMT
URL:
http://www.wired.com/epicenter/2011/03/eli-pariser-at-ted/
Extrait -
TED 2011: Junk Food Algorithms and the World They Feed Us
+About
- About
Entrée par:
Peter Baldwin
NodeID:
#93112
Node type:
Issue
Date d'entrée (GMT):
2/26/2011 2:37:00 AM
Date de la dernière modification (Heure GMT):
2/26/2011 2:37:00 AM
Show other editors
Corrélations entrantes:
0
Corrélations sortantes:
0
Evaluation moyenne:
0
by
0
utilisateurs
x
Select file to upload