Three-level distinction is too simple
The three levels distinction is too simple. There are more levels and modelling strategies than just three.
Gardner Quarnton (1988).
Immediately related elementsHow this works
-
Artificial Intelligence »Artificial Intelligence
Can computers think? [1] »Can computers think? [1]
Yes: connectionist networks can think [5a] »Yes: connectionist networks can think [5a]
The Subsymbolic Paradigm »The Subsymbolic Paradigm
Smolensky's treatment of levels is problematic »Smolensky's treatment of levels is problematic
Three-level distinction is too simple
+Commentaires (0)
+Citations (0)
+About