Idea types and relationships?
Different types of maps within Debategraph use different sets of idea- and relationship- types – and it's straightforward to introduce new sets and/or expand the existing sets. What changes and additions would you like to see?
Immediately related elementsHow this works
-
DebateGraph Community »DebateGraph Community
▲
Development Ideas »Development Ideas
▲
Improving existing features? »Improving existing features?
■
Idea types and relationships?
●
"Decision" node type needs a sub-component type (like "positions") »"Decision" node type needs a sub-component type (like "positions")
●
Argument structuring could be improved »Argument structuring could be improved
●
Clarify the use of argument groups »Clarify the use of argument groups
●
Moves may create type inconsistencies »Moves may create type inconsistencies
●
Part arguments were a useful measure against cluttered views »Part arguments were a useful measure against cluttered views
+Commentaires (0)
+Citations (0)
+About