Idea types and relationships?
Different types of maps within Debategraph use different sets of idea- and relationship- types – and it's straightforward to introduce new sets and/or expand the existing sets. What changes and additions would you like to see?
Immediately related elementsHow this works
-
DebateGraph Community »DebateGraph Community
Development Ideas »Development Ideas
Improving existing features? »Improving existing features?
Idea types and relationships?
"Decision" node type needs a sub-component type (like "positions") »"Decision" node type needs a sub-component type (like "positions")
Argument structuring could be improved »Argument structuring could be improved
Clarify the use of argument groups »Clarify the use of argument groups
Moves may create type inconsistencies »Moves may create type inconsistencies
Part arguments were a useful measure against cluttered views »Part arguments were a useful measure against cluttered views
+Commentaires (0)
+Citations (0)
+About