Brain-style modelling can be misleading
Basing psychological theories on facts about the brain can be misleading. Neural inspiration seems useful, but it's led to a revival of such weak psychological theories as: associationism; microfeature analysis; and  statistically based learning.
"One should be deeply suspicious of the heroic sort of brain modelling the purports to address the problems of cognition."

Jerry Fodor & Zenon Pylyshyn 1988 (p.64).
Immediately related elementsHow this works
-
Artificial Intelligence »Artificial Intelligence
▲
Can computers think? [1] »Can computers think? [1]
▲
Yes: connectionist networks can think [5a] »Yes: connectionist networks can think [5a]
▲
The Connectionist Biological Assumption  »The Connectionist Biological Assumption
■
Brain-style modelling can be misleading
◄
Jerry Fodor »Jerry Fodor
◄
Zenon Pylyshyn »Zenon Pylyshyn
+Commentaires (0)
+Citations (0)
+About